We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
A pilot study estimating liver fibrosis with ultrasound shear-wave elastography: does the cause of liver disease or location of measurement affect performance?
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology 2014 September
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of real-time shear-wave elastography for assessment of liver fibrosis in an unselected patient population, comparing shear-wave elastography measurements obtained at and remote from the site of random liver biopsy.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study of 50 patients (21 with and 29 without hepatitis C) referred for clinically indicated random liver biopsy for diffuse liver disease, shear-wave elastography measurements were taken from four locations before biopsy: one at the left lobe, two at the right lobe, and one at the biopsy location. The mean, minimum, maximum, and SD of shear-wave elastography were compared with pathologic grading. Steatosis and serum markers were analyzed using multiple logistic regression. Optimized shear-wave elastography thresholds were calculated using AUC analysis.
RESULTS: The AUC (95% CI) at the biopsy site, ipsilateral lobe, and contralateral lobe were 0.82 (0.63-1.0), 0.84 (0.67-1.0), and 0.59 (0.19-0.99) in hepatitis C patients; 0.89 (0.75-1.0), 0.88 (0.73-1.0), and 0.93 (0.80-1.0) in nonhepatitis C patients; and 0.85 (0.74-0.96), 0.89 (0.79-0.99), and 0.80 (0.67-0.93) in all patients, respectively. Optimized biopsy site shear-wave elastography values for detecting Metavir score F2 or greater were 1.87 m/s (75% sensitivity and specificity), 2.00 m/s (80% sensitivity and specificity), and 1.89 m/s (76% sensitivity and specificity) in hepatitis C, nonhepatitis C, and all patients, respectively. Steatosis and serum markers were not significant.
CONCLUSION: Real-time shear-wave elastography accurately predicted significant fibrosis (stage ≥ 2) in an unselected patient population with diffuse disease, including patients with and without hepatitis C. Shear-wave elastography best predicts pathologic grading when taken at the biopsy site or ipsilateral lobe in hepatitis C patients. Percentage steatosis was not predictive of shear-wave elastography results.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study of 50 patients (21 with and 29 without hepatitis C) referred for clinically indicated random liver biopsy for diffuse liver disease, shear-wave elastography measurements were taken from four locations before biopsy: one at the left lobe, two at the right lobe, and one at the biopsy location. The mean, minimum, maximum, and SD of shear-wave elastography were compared with pathologic grading. Steatosis and serum markers were analyzed using multiple logistic regression. Optimized shear-wave elastography thresholds were calculated using AUC analysis.
RESULTS: The AUC (95% CI) at the biopsy site, ipsilateral lobe, and contralateral lobe were 0.82 (0.63-1.0), 0.84 (0.67-1.0), and 0.59 (0.19-0.99) in hepatitis C patients; 0.89 (0.75-1.0), 0.88 (0.73-1.0), and 0.93 (0.80-1.0) in nonhepatitis C patients; and 0.85 (0.74-0.96), 0.89 (0.79-0.99), and 0.80 (0.67-0.93) in all patients, respectively. Optimized biopsy site shear-wave elastography values for detecting Metavir score F2 or greater were 1.87 m/s (75% sensitivity and specificity), 2.00 m/s (80% sensitivity and specificity), and 1.89 m/s (76% sensitivity and specificity) in hepatitis C, nonhepatitis C, and all patients, respectively. Steatosis and serum markers were not significant.
CONCLUSION: Real-time shear-wave elastography accurately predicted significant fibrosis (stage ≥ 2) in an unselected patient population with diffuse disease, including patients with and without hepatitis C. Shear-wave elastography best predicts pathologic grading when taken at the biopsy site or ipsilateral lobe in hepatitis C patients. Percentage steatosis was not predictive of shear-wave elastography results.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app