We have located links that may give you full text access.
The shocking truth-time between defibrillation attempts during pre-hospital resuscitation of vf cardiac arrest.
Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ 2014 September
OBJECTIVES & BACKGROUND: Timely defibrillation and high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are the only pre-hospital interventions which have been demonstrated to save lives after OHCA (out-of-hospital cardiac arrest). Standard resuscitation using the advanced life support (ALS) algorithm specifies a period of two minutes of CPR after delivering a shock before re-assessing the rhythm and delivering a further shock if indicated. Recent work has focused on improving quality of CPR, but few studies have examined how effectively defibrillation is carried out in pre-hospital practice. This study aims to assess the timing of shocks during resuscitation after OHCA.
METHODS: Defibrillator (Philips MRX) data is routinely downloaded after all OHCA in Edinburgh as part of routine audit. We analysed a consecutive series of arrests 1-April-2013 and 31-March-2014. Only arrests where >1 consecutive shocks were delivered were included, in order to allow inter-shock intervals to be calculated. Event Review Pro software (Philips) was used to visualise ECG and CPR data, to determine time between shocks with no interrupting period of non-shockable rhythm. Inter-shock intervals between 2:00 min and 2:30 min were deemed compliant with ALS guidelines.
RESULTS: There were 189 cardiac arrests in the study period, with 70 cases eligible for inclusion. Mean time between shocks was 3:06 min (0:15 min-18:23 min, SD 1:54 min). 53% of inter-shock intervals were >2:30 min and 21% were <2:00 min. Only 26% of intervals were compliant with ALS guidelines. Figure 1 shows a scatter plot of the inter-shock intervals for each OHCA resuscitation episode. The red bar indicates the 'compliant' zone of 2:00-2:30 min. emermed;31/9/781-b/EMERMED2014204221F7F1EMERMED2014204221F7 CONCLUSION: The majority of intervals between shocks delivered in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were non-compliant with current ALS guidelines. Whilst the underlying reasons for this finding remain unclear, the extreme outliers appeared to be related to transporting the patient from the scene of the arrest. It was still the case, however, that the majority of defibrillation attempts were delivered either earlier than 2 min or later than 2:30 min, which may reflect a loss of situational awareness in the distracting environment of an OHCA resuscitation. Further work needs to be done to establish the cause of this deviation from recommended shock timing in order to develop strategies to optimise practice.
METHODS: Defibrillator (Philips MRX) data is routinely downloaded after all OHCA in Edinburgh as part of routine audit. We analysed a consecutive series of arrests 1-April-2013 and 31-March-2014. Only arrests where >1 consecutive shocks were delivered were included, in order to allow inter-shock intervals to be calculated. Event Review Pro software (Philips) was used to visualise ECG and CPR data, to determine time between shocks with no interrupting period of non-shockable rhythm. Inter-shock intervals between 2:00 min and 2:30 min were deemed compliant with ALS guidelines.
RESULTS: There were 189 cardiac arrests in the study period, with 70 cases eligible for inclusion. Mean time between shocks was 3:06 min (0:15 min-18:23 min, SD 1:54 min). 53% of inter-shock intervals were >2:30 min and 21% were <2:00 min. Only 26% of intervals were compliant with ALS guidelines. Figure 1 shows a scatter plot of the inter-shock intervals for each OHCA resuscitation episode. The red bar indicates the 'compliant' zone of 2:00-2:30 min. emermed;31/9/781-b/EMERMED2014204221F7F1EMERMED2014204221F7 CONCLUSION: The majority of intervals between shocks delivered in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were non-compliant with current ALS guidelines. Whilst the underlying reasons for this finding remain unclear, the extreme outliers appeared to be related to transporting the patient from the scene of the arrest. It was still the case, however, that the majority of defibrillation attempts were delivered either earlier than 2 min or later than 2:30 min, which may reflect a loss of situational awareness in the distracting environment of an OHCA resuscitation. Further work needs to be done to establish the cause of this deviation from recommended shock timing in order to develop strategies to optimise practice.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app