We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Consultations in general practice: a comparison of patients' and doctors' satisfaction.
BMJ : British Medical Journal 1989 October 22
OBJECTIVE: To provide an objective means of assessing patients' and doctors' satisfaction with a consultation.
DESIGN: Questionnaire study of patients and general practitioners after consultations.
SETTING: Urban general practice.
SUBJECTS: 250 Patients attending consecutive consultations conducted by five general practitioners.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Identification of deficiencies within a consultation as perceived by both doctors and patients.
RESULTS: The doctor's and patient's questionnaires for each consultation were matched and the results analysed on a group basis. The response rate for individual questions was high (81-89%). The doctors and patients significantly disagreed about the doctors' ability to assess and put patients at ease, to offer explanations and advice on treatment, and to allow expression of emotional feelings and about the overall benefit that the patients gained from the consultation. In all cases of disagreement the doctor had a more negative view of the consultation than the patient.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of giving structured questionnaires on consultations to both patients and doctors could be a useful teaching tool for established doctors or those in training to improve the quality and sensitivity of care they provide.
DESIGN: Questionnaire study of patients and general practitioners after consultations.
SETTING: Urban general practice.
SUBJECTS: 250 Patients attending consecutive consultations conducted by five general practitioners.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Identification of deficiencies within a consultation as perceived by both doctors and patients.
RESULTS: The doctor's and patient's questionnaires for each consultation were matched and the results analysed on a group basis. The response rate for individual questions was high (81-89%). The doctors and patients significantly disagreed about the doctors' ability to assess and put patients at ease, to offer explanations and advice on treatment, and to allow expression of emotional feelings and about the overall benefit that the patients gained from the consultation. In all cases of disagreement the doctor had a more negative view of the consultation than the patient.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of giving structured questionnaires on consultations to both patients and doctors could be a useful teaching tool for established doctors or those in training to improve the quality and sensitivity of care they provide.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app