We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL, PHASE II
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Phase II gemcitabine and capecitabine combination therapy in recurrent or metastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracycline and taxane.
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 2014 October
PURPOSE: We conducted a phase II study evaluating safety and efficacy of combination gemcitabine and capecitabine therapy for metastatic breast cancer patients following anthracycline and taxane treatment in Korea.
METHODS: This was a single-arm, non-randomized phase II study. Patients received 1,000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine intravenously over 30 min on days 1 and 8, and 1,250 mg/m(2) capecitabine orally twice daily on days 1-14 until disease progression or intolerable toxicity occurred. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks. The primary outcome assessed was overall response rate [ORR, complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) as the best response], and secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) [maintenance of CR + PR + stable disease (SD) for at least 3 months], drug toxicity, and predictive factors for response to this regimen.
RESULTS: Of 41 patients, the ORR was 39.0% (CR 0%; PR 39.0%), and DCR was 78.0% using this chemotherapy. DCR for 6 and 12 months was 68.3 and 26.8%, respectively. Median PFS was 10.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.8-12.1], and median OS was 25.1 months (95% CI 18.2-32.1). Prominent toxicities were neutropenia and hand-foot syndrome. Most adverse events were well known, relatively moderate, and reversible. Taxane sensitivity [odds ratio (OR) 0.169; 95% CI 0.034-0.826; P = 0.028] and hepatic metastasis (OR 0.097; 95% CI 0.017-0.559; P = 0.009) were significantly predictive of response to gemcitabine and capecitabine combination.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed reproducible anticancer activity and tolerable toxicity of gemcitabine and capecitabine combination therapy in recurrent or metastatic Korean breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracycline and taxane.
METHODS: This was a single-arm, non-randomized phase II study. Patients received 1,000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine intravenously over 30 min on days 1 and 8, and 1,250 mg/m(2) capecitabine orally twice daily on days 1-14 until disease progression or intolerable toxicity occurred. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks. The primary outcome assessed was overall response rate [ORR, complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) as the best response], and secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) [maintenance of CR + PR + stable disease (SD) for at least 3 months], drug toxicity, and predictive factors for response to this regimen.
RESULTS: Of 41 patients, the ORR was 39.0% (CR 0%; PR 39.0%), and DCR was 78.0% using this chemotherapy. DCR for 6 and 12 months was 68.3 and 26.8%, respectively. Median PFS was 10.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.8-12.1], and median OS was 25.1 months (95% CI 18.2-32.1). Prominent toxicities were neutropenia and hand-foot syndrome. Most adverse events were well known, relatively moderate, and reversible. Taxane sensitivity [odds ratio (OR) 0.169; 95% CI 0.034-0.826; P = 0.028] and hepatic metastasis (OR 0.097; 95% CI 0.017-0.559; P = 0.009) were significantly predictive of response to gemcitabine and capecitabine combination.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed reproducible anticancer activity and tolerable toxicity of gemcitabine and capecitabine combination therapy in recurrent or metastatic Korean breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracycline and taxane.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app