COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Pregnancy outcome and placental findings in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction with and without preeclampsia.

OBJECTIVE: To compare pregnancy outcome and placental pathology in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction (FGR) with and without preeclampsia.

METHODS: Labor, fetal/neonatal outcome, and placental pathology parameters from neonates with a birth weight below the 10 th percentile (FGR), born between 24 and 42 weeks of gestation, were reviewed. Results were compared between pregnancies complicated with preeclampsia (hypertensive FGR [H-FGR]) to those without preeclampsia (normotensive FGR [N-FGR]). Composite neonatal outcome, defined as 1 or more of early complication (respiratory distress, necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, transfusion, ventilation, seizure, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, phototherapy, or death), Apgar score ≤ 7 at 5 minutes, and days of hospitalization, were compared between the groups. Placental lesions, classified as lesions related to maternal vascular supply, lesions consistent with fetal thrombo-occlusive disease and inflammatory lesions, maternal inflammatory response, and fetal inflammatory response, were also compared.

RESULTS: Women in the H-FGR group (n = 72) were older, with higher body mass index (BMI) and higher rate of preterm labor (<34 weeks) than in the N-FGR group (n = 270), P < .001 for all. Composite neonatal outcome was worse in the H-FGR than in the N-FGR group, 50% versus 15.5%, P < .001. Higher rate of maternal placental vascular lesions was detected in H-FGR compared with N-FGR, 82% versus 57.7%, P < .001. Using a stepwise logistic regression model, maternal BMI (1.13 odds ratio [OR], confidence interval [CI] 1.035-1.227, P = .006) and neonatal birth weight (0.996 OR, CI 0.995-0.998, P < .001) were independently associated with worse neonatal outcome.

CONCLUSION: Worse neonatal outcome and more maternal placental vascular lesions in pregnancy complicated by FGR with preeclampsia versus FGR without preeclampsia suggest different pathophysiology in these entities.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app