We have located links that may give you full text access.
Epithelial cell foot process effacement in podocytes in focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis: a quantitative analysis.
Ultrastructural Pathology 2014 October
BACKGROUND/AIM: Effacement of the epithelial cell foot processes of glomerular podocytes are thought to be diffuse in the primary form of focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). In contrast, effacements that occur in the secondary form of FSGS are thought to be focal. To evaluate this theory, the extent of epithelial cell foot process effacement was analyzed and compared in podocytes from cases of primary and secondary FSGS.
METHODS: Consecutive cases of adult primary and secondary FSGS that were diagnosed between January 1997 and December 2010 were retrospectively retrieved and analyzed. The electron microscopy materials of all specimens were reviewed. Glomerular podocytes from each sample were counted, recorded and analyzed for the percentage of diffuse versus focal epithelial foot process effacement.
RESULTS: Seventeen primary and 16 secondary FSGS specimens were reviewed. In the 17 primary FSGS cases, 35.1% of the podocytes were focally fused, and 64.9% were diffusely fused. In the 16 secondary FSGS cases, 72.1% of the podocytes were focally fused. There were significantly more focally fused podocytes in secondary FSGS than in primary FSGS. In contrast, significantly more diffusely fused podocytes were observed in primary FSGS than in secondary FSGS.
CONCLUSION: This is the first study to perform a quantitative analysis of the extent of epithelial cell foot process effacement in podocytes in primary and secondary FSGS. This study also confirms that the electron microscopic characteristics of the podocyte effacement process can be used to facilitate the diagnosis of primary versus secondary FSGS.
METHODS: Consecutive cases of adult primary and secondary FSGS that were diagnosed between January 1997 and December 2010 were retrospectively retrieved and analyzed. The electron microscopy materials of all specimens were reviewed. Glomerular podocytes from each sample were counted, recorded and analyzed for the percentage of diffuse versus focal epithelial foot process effacement.
RESULTS: Seventeen primary and 16 secondary FSGS specimens were reviewed. In the 17 primary FSGS cases, 35.1% of the podocytes were focally fused, and 64.9% were diffusely fused. In the 16 secondary FSGS cases, 72.1% of the podocytes were focally fused. There were significantly more focally fused podocytes in secondary FSGS than in primary FSGS. In contrast, significantly more diffusely fused podocytes were observed in primary FSGS than in secondary FSGS.
CONCLUSION: This is the first study to perform a quantitative analysis of the extent of epithelial cell foot process effacement in podocytes in primary and secondary FSGS. This study also confirms that the electron microscopic characteristics of the podocyte effacement process can be used to facilitate the diagnosis of primary versus secondary FSGS.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app