Comparison of outside-in and inside-out technique for tibial fixation of a soft-tissue graft in ACL reconstruction using the Shim technique.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of tibial fixation of a free tendon graft in ACL reconstruction using the Shim, a new wedge-shaped implant, in an outside-in technique to fixation by the Shim used in an inside-out technique and fixation by interference screw in a porcine model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Porcine tibia and flexor tendons were used. In Group 1, the Shim was applied outside-in. In Group 2, the Shim was inserted inside-out. In the Group 3, an 8-mm interference screw was used. Ten specimens were tested in each group. Load-to-failure, elongation, stiffness and failure mode were recorded. Cyclic loading was performed between 5 and 250 N for 1,000 cycles, followed by a load to failure testing.

RESULTS: Mean maximum load-to-failure was 629.53 N in Group 1,648.54 N in Group 2 and 749.53 N in Group 3. There was no significant difference between the groups. Stiffness varied between 127.34 N/mm in Group 1, 151.27 N/mm in Group 2 and 182.25 N/mm in Group 3. No significant differences were found between outside-in Shim and interference screw fixation. No significant difference was found for elongation among the three groups. The main failure mode was a rupture of the tendon in the IFS group and a slippage of either the implant or the tendon in both groups using the Shim.

CONCLUSIONS: As no statistically significant difference could be seen concerning load to failure, stiffness and elongation between the inside-out and the outside-in techniques, the Shim can be used for tibial fixation in an outside-in or inside-out technique depending on the preference of the surgeon. To prevent slippage of the graft a hybrid fixation should be considered.