We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Evaluation Studies
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Validation Studies
Evaluation of aortic stenosis severity using 4D flow jet shear layer detection for the measurement of valve effective orifice area.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2014 September
AIMS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of 4D flow MRI to assess valve effective orifice area (EOA) in patients with aortic stenosis as determined by the jet shear layer detection (JSLD) method.
METHODS AND RESULTS: An in-vitro stenosis phantom was used for validation and in-vivo imaging was performed in 10 healthy controls and 40 patients with aortic stenosis. EOA was calculated by the JSLD method using standard 2D phase contrast MRI (PC-MRI) and 4D flow MRI measurements (EOAJSLD-2D and EOAJSLD-4D, respectively). As a reference standard, the continuity equation was used to calculate EOA (EOACE) with the 2D PC-MRI velocity field and compared to the EOAJSLD measurements. The in-vitro results exhibited excellent agreement between flow theory (EOA=0.78cm(2)) and experimental measurement (EOAJSLD-4D=0.78±0.01cm(2)) for peak velocities ranging from 0.9 to 3.7m/s. In-vivo results showed good correlation and agreement between EOAJSLD-2D and EOACE (r=0.91, p<0.001; bias: -0.01±0.38cm(2); agreement limits: 0.75 to -0.77cm(2)), and between EOAJSLD-4D and EOACE (r=0.95, p<0.001; bias: -0.09±0.26cm(2); limits: 0.43 to -0.62cm(2)).
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of measuring EOAJSLD using 4D flow MRI. The technique allows for optimization of the EOA measurement position by visualizing the 3D vena contracta, and avoids potential sources of EOACE measurement variability.
METHODS AND RESULTS: An in-vitro stenosis phantom was used for validation and in-vivo imaging was performed in 10 healthy controls and 40 patients with aortic stenosis. EOA was calculated by the JSLD method using standard 2D phase contrast MRI (PC-MRI) and 4D flow MRI measurements (EOAJSLD-2D and EOAJSLD-4D, respectively). As a reference standard, the continuity equation was used to calculate EOA (EOACE) with the 2D PC-MRI velocity field and compared to the EOAJSLD measurements. The in-vitro results exhibited excellent agreement between flow theory (EOA=0.78cm(2)) and experimental measurement (EOAJSLD-4D=0.78±0.01cm(2)) for peak velocities ranging from 0.9 to 3.7m/s. In-vivo results showed good correlation and agreement between EOAJSLD-2D and EOACE (r=0.91, p<0.001; bias: -0.01±0.38cm(2); agreement limits: 0.75 to -0.77cm(2)), and between EOAJSLD-4D and EOACE (r=0.95, p<0.001; bias: -0.09±0.26cm(2); limits: 0.43 to -0.62cm(2)).
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of measuring EOAJSLD using 4D flow MRI. The technique allows for optimization of the EOA measurement position by visualizing the 3D vena contracta, and avoids potential sources of EOACE measurement variability.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app