[Short- or long-outcome of early tirofiban in ST-segment elevated acute myocardial infarction undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the optimal timing of tirofiban early treatment in ST-segment elevated acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS: A total of 118 consecutive STEMI patients were enrolled in the study. They were randomly assigned to the tirofiban early treatment group with tirofiban administrated routinely at ≥ 4 hours prior to angiography or the control group with tirofiban provisional administrated during or after angiography. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow, creatine kinase MB isoenzyme (CK-MB) levels, acute thrombus events, efficacy and safety endpoints at Day 7, Day 30, 6 months and 1 year (efficacy endpoints: death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization and ischemic stroke; safety endpoints: bleeding and thrombocytopenia) were observed and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS: A total of 104 STEMI patients underwent elective PCI with 52 patients in each group and the baseline characteristics were balanced between the two groups. Tirofiban was administered (5.9 ± 2.9) hours earlier in the tirofiban early treatment group than the control group. No statistical difference was observed between the two groups in TIMI flow before[grade 0: 18 (34.6%) vs 19 (36.5%) , grade 3: 28 (53.8%) vs 27 (51.9%)] and after PCI[grade 3: 52 (100.0%) vs 51 (98.1%)]. No difference was shown between the two groups in CK-MB levels before PCI [(12.9 ± 5.1) U/L vs (12.0 ± 5.2) U/L, P > 0.05]; and the increase of CK-MB 12-24 hours after PCI [(1.0 ± 6.2) U/L vs (2.3 ± 8.3) U/L, P > 0.05]. The incidence of acute thrombus events was similar (7.7% vs 15.4%, P > 0.05). No statistical difference was observed between the two groups in the efficacy endpoints at Day 7 (0.0% vs 7.7%, P > 0.05), Day 30 (0.0% vs 7.8%, P > 0.05), 6 months (2.0% vs 9.8%, P > 0.05) and 1 year (2.2% vs 9.8%, P > 0.05). Similar incidence was shown in the slight bleeding (15.4% vs 5.8%, P > 0.05) and the slight thrombocytopenia (0.0% vs 1.9%, P > 0.05), while no severe to moderate bleeding or severe thrombocytopenia happened in both groups.

CONCLUSION: Tirofiban early treatment is not better than the tirofiban bailout treatment during or after PCI in STEMI patients undergoing elective PCI. Trail registration ChiCTR-TRC-10000809.