Evaluation of erlotinib treatment response in non-small cell lung cancer using metabolic and anatomic criteria

A Stefano, G Russo, M Ippolito, S Cosentino, G Murè, S Baldari, M G Sabini, D Sardina, L M Valastro, R Bordonaro, C Messa, M C Gilardi, H Soto Parra
Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2014 May 9
24809275

AIM: In this paper the clinical value of PET for early prediction of tumor response to Erlotinib in patients with advanced or metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after failure of at least one prior chemotherapy regimen is evaluated. The aim was to compare the early metabolic treatment response using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 1999 recommendations and PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST), and the standard treatment response using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).

METHODS: Twenty patients with stage IV NSCLC were enrolled prospectively. PET/CT studies were performed before, then 48 h, and 45 days after the initiation of Erlotinib treatment. The lesion with the highest uptake in each patient was evaluated according to EORTC 1999 recommendations, PERCIST and RECIST to assess metabolic and anatomic response. Response classifications were compared statistically using Wilcoxon signedrank test. Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS) were calculated by the KaplanMeier test.

RESULTS: At 48 h, the KaplanMeier analysis showed that EORTC proved to be a significant prognostic factor for predicting DFS and OS. At 45 days, there was a significant difference in response evaluation between RECIST and metabolic classifications. RECIST and PERCIST were significant prognostic factors for predicting DFS and OS. EORTC was not able to discriminate responder from non-responder patients.

CONCLUSION: This study shows that, according to the EORTC protocol, the PET exam is able to provide early identification of patients who benefit from Erlotinib treatment. Used at the end of therapy, PERCIST could be considered an appropriate metabolic evaluation method to discriminate responders from nonresponders.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
24809275
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"