JOURNAL ARTICLE

99mTc-Methylene diphosphonate SPECT/CT as the one-stop imaging modality for the diagnosis of osteoid osteoma

Punit Sharma, Anirban Mukherjee, Sellam Karunanithi, Jeyaseelan Nadarajah, Shivanand Gamanagatti, Shah A Khan, Chandrasekhar Bal, Rakesh Kumar
Nuclear Medicine Communications 2014, 35 (8): 876-83
24751704

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of Tc-methylene diphosphonate (Tc-MDP) single-photon emission tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of osteoid osteoma and compare the same with three-phase planar bone scintigraphy (BS) and CT alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 31 patients (age: 20.6±13.2 years; male: 80.6%) who had undergone Tc-MDP BS with SPECT/CT for clinically and/or radiographically suspected osteoid osteoma were retrospectively evaluated. Planar BS images were analyzed by an experienced nuclear medicine physician. CT images were evaluated by an experienced radiologist. SPECT/CT images were evaluated by the nuclear medicine physician and radiologist in consensus. On the basis of the diagnostic confidence the interpreters used a scoring scale of 1-3, in which 1 is negative for osteoid osteoma, 2 is equivocal, and 3 is positive for osteoid osteoma. For the calculation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for planar BS, CT, and SPECT/CT an interpretive score of 2 or higher was taken as positive for osteoid osteoma. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed and the area under the curve was calculated and compared. Histopathology and microbiology/clinical imaging follow-up was used as the reference standard.

RESULTS: There were nine equivocal lesions on planar BS and five equivocal lesions on CT, but none on SPECT/CT. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of SPECT/CT were all 100%; those of CT were 77.8, 92.3, and 83.8% and those of planar BS were 100, 38.4, and 74.1%, respectively. On comparison, the area under the curve of SPECT/CT was significantly larger than that of planar BS (1.00 vs. 0.761; P=0.005) and CT (1.00 vs. 0.872; P=0.044). However, no significant difference was seen between planar BS and CT (0.761 vs. 0.872; P=0.236).

CONCLUSION: Tc-MDP SPECT/CT shows excellent diagnostic accuracy for osteoid osteoma and can be used as a one-stop imaging modality for the same. It is superior to planar BS and CT alone for the diagnosis of suspected osteoid osteoma.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
24751704
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"