We have located links that may give you full text access.
Diagnosis of urothelial tumors with a dedicated dual-source dual-energy MDCT protocol: preliminary results.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology 2014 April
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a dedicated dual-source dual-energy MDCT (DECT) protocol for the detection of urothelial tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A DECT protocol including furosemide and split-bolus contrast injection was used in 69 consecutive patients with suspected abnormalities of the urinary system. Thirteen patients were excluded because there was no follow-up available. In 56 patients, the final diagnosis was proven with endoscopy, biopsy, or follow-up and included urothelial tumors (n = 37) in 16 patients, other urinary tract pathologies (n = 9) in eight patients, and absence of lesions of the collecting system in 32 patients. The image series consisted of a dual-energy true unenhanced series, 35-second arterial phase, and 8-minute nephrographic-excretory phase and were analyzed retrospectively. True enhancement of all detected lesions was measured. On the basis of the DECT data of the contrast-enhanced images, virtual unenhanced series were created and iodine concentration was calculated using commercially available software. The attenuation difference between virtual unenhanced and contrast-enhanced images (virtual enhancement) was measured. CT findings were compared with the final diagnosis.
RESULTS: Urothelial tumors were identified on 35-second series, 8-minute series, and both series combined, with sensitivity of 91.9% (95% CI, 78.1-98.2%), 83.4% (68.0-93.8%), and 97.3% (85.8-100%), respectively. Urothelial tumors showed stronger virtual enhancement (p = 0.02) and higher iodine concentration (p = 0.03) than lesions of other origin. Distinction between urothelial tumors and nontumoral lesions was possible with sensitivity of 91.9% (78.1-98.2%) when using a threshold concentration of at least 1.0 mg I/mL.
CONCLUSION: Dual phase DECT with virtual unenhanced imaging and iodine concentration measurement appears to be a useful diagnostic test for urothelial tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A DECT protocol including furosemide and split-bolus contrast injection was used in 69 consecutive patients with suspected abnormalities of the urinary system. Thirteen patients were excluded because there was no follow-up available. In 56 patients, the final diagnosis was proven with endoscopy, biopsy, or follow-up and included urothelial tumors (n = 37) in 16 patients, other urinary tract pathologies (n = 9) in eight patients, and absence of lesions of the collecting system in 32 patients. The image series consisted of a dual-energy true unenhanced series, 35-second arterial phase, and 8-minute nephrographic-excretory phase and were analyzed retrospectively. True enhancement of all detected lesions was measured. On the basis of the DECT data of the contrast-enhanced images, virtual unenhanced series were created and iodine concentration was calculated using commercially available software. The attenuation difference between virtual unenhanced and contrast-enhanced images (virtual enhancement) was measured. CT findings were compared with the final diagnosis.
RESULTS: Urothelial tumors were identified on 35-second series, 8-minute series, and both series combined, with sensitivity of 91.9% (95% CI, 78.1-98.2%), 83.4% (68.0-93.8%), and 97.3% (85.8-100%), respectively. Urothelial tumors showed stronger virtual enhancement (p = 0.02) and higher iodine concentration (p = 0.03) than lesions of other origin. Distinction between urothelial tumors and nontumoral lesions was possible with sensitivity of 91.9% (78.1-98.2%) when using a threshold concentration of at least 1.0 mg I/mL.
CONCLUSION: Dual phase DECT with virtual unenhanced imaging and iodine concentration measurement appears to be a useful diagnostic test for urothelial tumors.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app