JOURNAL ARTICLE

Adverse events associated with biodegradable lactide-containing suture anchors

Andres F Cobaleda Aristizabal, Eric J Sanders, F Alan Barber
Arthroscopy: the Journal of Arthroscopic & related Surgery 2014, 30 (5): 555-60
24650833

PURPOSE: To evaluate the occurrence of adverse events and inflammatory reactions related to the use of biodegradable anchors.

METHODS: A retrospective review of a consecutive series of arthroscopic shoulder procedures using biodegradable suture anchors performed by a single surgeon was undertaken. The database was purged of patient identifiers. The blinded data were analyzed for procedure type, anchor type and composition, associated procedures, and general demographic data. Anchor composition and number were recorded. A shoulder procedure after the index operation was considered an adverse event. The nature of these procedures was evaluated using medical records, operative images, and video, looking specifically for inflammatory reactions. Any anchor-related issues were documented.

RESULTS: Three hundred sixty cases met the inclusion criteria. The procedure was a tendon repair (rotator cuff or biceps) in 265 cases and a labral repair (instability or SLAP) in 97, 2 of which were combined instability and tendon repairs. Nine different biodegradable anchors were identified, possessing 4 different polymer combinations. Adverse events (reoperations) were identified in 18 of 360 patients (5%): 13 tendon repairs and 5 labral/instability repairs. Only 2 were anchor related. In 1 tendon repair case, the anchor broke and an anchor fragment required removal. In 1 labral repair case, the anchor eyelet (a suture) loosened from the anchor body and eroded the humeral head. No cases of inflammatory synovitis were observed. No statistical difference in adverse event rates existed between tendon and labral repairs (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS: Anchor-specific adverse events occurred in 2 of 360 procedures (0.5%). One was anchor design related (the prominent head containing the suture eyelet broke off) in a poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) anchor. One was anchor material related and occurred when the poly-levo (70%)/dextro (30%)-lactide anchor body reabsorbed, loosening the encased eyelet suture and allowing this suture to migrate into the joint. No inflammatory reactions were documented in the slowly degrading pure PLLA or more rapidly degrading biocomposite PLLA/β-tricalcium phosphate-based anchors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective review, therapeutic study.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
24650833
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"