COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in heart and heart-lung transplantations: a 15-year retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major factor limiting long-term survival after heart transplantation (HTx). Specific determinants of CAV and long-term outcome after CAV occurrence have been poorly investigated after heart-lung transplantation (HLTx).

METHODS: Between January 1996 and December 2006, 79 patients underwent HLTx (36.3 ± 12.2 years old; 47% men) and 141 patients underwent HTx (49.2 ± 12.3 years old; 77% men) at two different institutions. CAV grading was reviewed in both groups according to the 2010 standardized nomenclature of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. The mean post-transplant follow-up was 94 (1 to 181) months.

RESULTS: Overall 10-year survival rate was 58% after HTx and 43% after HLTx (p = 0.11). The Grade 1 (or higher) CAV-free survival rate was 95% at 4 years and 69% at 10 years after HLTx, and 77% and 39%, respectively, after HTx (p < 0.01). Mean cyclosporine blood levels were similar between the groups at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. The main causes of mortality beyond 5 years after HTx and HLTx were malignancies and bronchiolitis obliterans, respectively. By multivariate analysis, recipients who developed >3 acute myocardial rejections during the first year post-transplant were exposed to a higher risk of CAV (95% CI 1.065 to 2.33, p = 0.02). Episodes of acute pulmonary rejection and bronchiolitis obliterans were not associated with an increased risk of CAV (p = 0.52 and p = 0.30).

CONCLUSION: HLTx recipients appeared protected from CAV compared with HTx patients in this retrospective study. Repeated acute cardiac rejections were independent predictors of CAV. Unlike bronchiolitis obliterans, CAV had a very low impact on long-term survival after HLTx.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app