We have located links that may give you full text access.
End-expiratory occlusion manoeuvre does not accurately predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre.
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2014 June
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine whether assessment of stroke volume (SV) and measurement of exhaled end-tidal carbon dioxide [Formula: see text] during an end-expiratory occlusion (EEO) test can predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre.
METHODS: Forty-two subjects monitored by oesophageal Doppler who required i.v. fluids during surgery were studied. Haemodynamic variables [heart rate, non-invasive arterial pressure, SV, cardiac output (CO), respiratory variation of SV (ΔrespSV), variation of SV during EEO, and E'(CO₂) were measured at baseline, during EEO (Δ(EEO)), and after fluid expansion. Responders were defined by an increase in SV over 15% after infusion of 500 ml of crystalloid solution.
RESULTS: Of the 42 subjects, 28 (67%) responded to fluid infusion. A cut-off of >2.3% ΔSV(EEO) predicted fluid responsiveness with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUC) curve of 0.78 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.63-0.89, P=0.003]. The AUC of ΔrespSV was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.76-0.97, P<0.001). With an AUC of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.51-0.81, P=0.07), E'(CO₂)(EEO) was poorly predictive of fluid responsiveness.
CONCLUSIONS: ΔSV(EEO) and ΔE'(CO₂) were unable to accurately predict fluid responsiveness during surgery.
METHODS: Forty-two subjects monitored by oesophageal Doppler who required i.v. fluids during surgery were studied. Haemodynamic variables [heart rate, non-invasive arterial pressure, SV, cardiac output (CO), respiratory variation of SV (ΔrespSV), variation of SV during EEO, and E'(CO₂) were measured at baseline, during EEO (Δ(EEO)), and after fluid expansion. Responders were defined by an increase in SV over 15% after infusion of 500 ml of crystalloid solution.
RESULTS: Of the 42 subjects, 28 (67%) responded to fluid infusion. A cut-off of >2.3% ΔSV(EEO) predicted fluid responsiveness with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUC) curve of 0.78 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.63-0.89, P=0.003]. The AUC of ΔrespSV was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.76-0.97, P<0.001). With an AUC of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.51-0.81, P=0.07), E'(CO₂)(EEO) was poorly predictive of fluid responsiveness.
CONCLUSIONS: ΔSV(EEO) and ΔE'(CO₂) were unable to accurately predict fluid responsiveness during surgery.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app