COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of pharyngeal airway volume among different vertical skeletal patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study.

Angle Orthodontist 2014 September
OBJECTIVE: To test the null hypothesis that there are no significant differences in pharyngeal airway volumes among adult patients with different vertical skeletal patterns and a clinically normal sagittal skeletal pattern using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study sample consisted of 100 adult patients (45 men and 55 women; mean age  =  24.0 ± 5.3 years) with a normal sagittal skeletal pattern divided into three groups according to the vertical skeletal patterns: high angle (32 patients: 15 women and 17 men), low angle (34 patients: 14 women and 20 men), and normal angle (34 patients: 16 women and 18 men) groups. Nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and total airway volumes of patients in all vertical groups were calculated. Group differences were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests.

RESULTS: Nasopharyngeal airway volume in the high-angle group (mean  =  6067.9 ± 1693.9 mm(3)) was significantly lower than that of the low- and normal-angle groups (P < .01). Oropharyngeal airway volume was highest in the low-angle group (mean  =  15,957.6 ± 6817.2 mm(3)) and significantly decreased in the control (mean  =  11,826.1 ± 4831.9 mm(3); P  =  .008) and high angle (mean  =  10,869.1 ± 4084.1 mm(3); P  =  .001) groups. Total airway volume was highest in the low-angle group (mean  =  24,261.6 ± 8470.1 mm(3)) and lowest in the high-angle group (mean  =  16,937.0 ± 5027.4 mm(3); P < .001).

CONCLUSION: The null hypothesis was rejected. Significant differences were found in pharyngeal airway volumes among different skeletal vertical patterns.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app