We have located links that may give you full text access.
Illness representations predict adherence in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes.
Psychology & Health 2014
OBJECTIVE: Most adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with type 1 diabetes struggle with diabetes self-management and exhibit suboptimal glycemic control. This study examined two models of association between illness representations, a modifiable predictor of suboptimal outcomes, and adherence and glycemic control in AYAs with type 1 diabetes.
DESIGN AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ninety-nine AYAs (ages 15-20 years) completed measures of illness representations and adherence at two visits. Blood glucose monitoring frequency and haemoglobin A1c were obtained via chart review. Relationships were examined using structural equation modelling.
RESULTS: Illness representations accounted for a significant proportion of the variance in blood glucose monitoring frequency (ΔR2 = .23, p < .01) and adherence to emergency precautions at Time 1 (ΔR2 = .07, p = .03). Illness representations also accounted for significant variance in blood glucose monitoring frequency (ΔR2 = .08, p = .01), adherence to recommendations for insulin and food (ΔR2 = .08, p = .02) and exercise (ΔR2 = .10, p < .01), and adherence to emergency precautions (ΔR2)= .16, p < .01) at Time 2.
CONCLUSION: Illness representations are salient predictors of adherence in this population. Interventions targeting adherence promotion and glycemic control in AYAs with type 1 diabetes may be enhanced by efforts to modify illness representations.
DESIGN AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ninety-nine AYAs (ages 15-20 years) completed measures of illness representations and adherence at two visits. Blood glucose monitoring frequency and haemoglobin A1c were obtained via chart review. Relationships were examined using structural equation modelling.
RESULTS: Illness representations accounted for a significant proportion of the variance in blood glucose monitoring frequency (ΔR2 = .23, p < .01) and adherence to emergency precautions at Time 1 (ΔR2 = .07, p = .03). Illness representations also accounted for significant variance in blood glucose monitoring frequency (ΔR2 = .08, p = .01), adherence to recommendations for insulin and food (ΔR2 = .08, p = .02) and exercise (ΔR2 = .10, p < .01), and adherence to emergency precautions (ΔR2)= .16, p < .01) at Time 2.
CONCLUSION: Illness representations are salient predictors of adherence in this population. Interventions targeting adherence promotion and glycemic control in AYAs with type 1 diabetes may be enhanced by efforts to modify illness representations.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app