JOURNAL ARTICLE

Clinical practice, resource utilization, and outcomes of device closure of patent foramen ovale in pediatrics

Shaji C Menon, Amanda Grove, Molly McFadden, Kent E Korgenski, Collin G Cowley
Pediatric Neurology 2014, 50 (3): 213-7
24433855

BACKGROUND: There are few data on patent foramen ovale closure and its outcome in children. In this study, we evaluated the current clinical practice, resource utilization, and outcome of device closure of patent foramen ovale in children. We hypothesized that patent foramen ovale closure would not result in a demonstrated benefit in children.

METHODS: We undertook a prospective survey of all consecutive patients (<20 years) who underwent patent foramen ovale closure in our metropolitan area between 1995 and 2010. Differences in proportions were tested using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test where appropriate. Differences in group medians were tested using Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS: A total of 153 patients (104 girls), median age 16 years (range 7-19) were studied. Indications for patent foramen ovale closure included: (1) migraine headache (104; 68%), (2) nonmigraine headache (24; 16%), (3) visual symptoms (110; 72%), (4) transient ischemic attack symptoms (42; 28%), and (5) stroke-like symptom (24; 16%). Patent foramen ovale was closed with an Amplatzer septal occluder in 115 (75%) and a Helex septal occluder in 47 (30%). The mean length of hospital stay was 18 ± 11 hours; the mean hospital charge was $24,126 ± $5808. The median duration of follow-up was 12 months, and 80 patients responded to the study survey. On follow-up, symptoms improved in 143 (93%), of which 29 (19%) had a residual shunt. None of the patient or treatment parameters predicted lack of improvement on follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of proven benefit, children undergo closure of the patent foramen ovale for a variety of reasons, with the vast majority (92%) of patients reporting significant improvement in their symptoms. However, patent foramen ovale closure is an expensive procedure with serious potential complications. Symptomatic improvement even in the presence of a residual shunt suggests a strong placebo effect.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
24433855
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"

We want to hear from doctors like you!

Take a second to answer a survey question.