We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Comparative review of diagnostic accuracy in tubal pregnancy: a 14-year survey of 1040 cases.
Obstetrics and Gynecology 1987 October
This paper summarizes our experience from 1972-1985 with the changing tools used in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. The study was divided into three time periods based on the diagnostic methods used in each. In the first period (1972-1975), diagnosis was by culdocentesis and the urine pregnancy test. In the second period (1976-1978), diagnostic laparoscopy was added. Finally, in the third period (1979-1985), serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) assay and pelvic ultrasonography were added. A rising trend in diagnostic accuracy was observed from the first period to the third. The predictability and the negative predictive value of diagnostic tests in the third period were 96.3 and 94.9%, respectively--significantly higher than in the first and second periods. The incidence of unruptured tubal pregnancy increased significantly, from 27.6% in the first and the second periods to 42.5% in the third period. Laparoscopy, ultrasonography, and serum beta-hCG assay each revealed a positive rate of more than 90% in the diagnosis of tubal pregnancy. Laparoscopy had the highest positive predictive value as a single test in the third period. Among suspected cases, however, laparoscopy was found to have a low accuracy in discriminating between tubal pregnancy and infection. The combination of serum beta-hCG testing and ultrasonography produced a 99% positive predictive value, and revealed a higher degree of accuracy in the diagnosis of tubal pregnancy than any other single test or combination of tests.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Demystifying normal-anion-gap metabolic acidosis: pathophysiology, aetiology, evaluation and diagnosis.Internal Medicine Journal 2024 July
Nutritional Support in the ICU.BMJ : British Medical Journal 2025 January 2
Elective peri-operative management of adults taking glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors: a multidisciplinary consensus statement: A consensus statement from the Association of Anaesthetists, Association of British Clinical Diabetologists, British Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Society, Centre for Perioperative Care, Joint British Diabetes Societies for Inpatient Care, Royal College of Anaesthetists, Society for Obesity and Bariatric Anaesthesia and UK Clinical Pharmacy Association.Anaesthesia 2025 January 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2025 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app