Comparative Study
Controlled Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Electrocardiography in 110 patients with systemic sclerosis: a cross-sectional comparison with population-based controls.

OBJECTIVES: Patchy fibrosis of the myocardium is thought to cause conduction abnormalities in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). We compared the prevalence and type of rhythm/conduction disturbances in 74% of the SSc patients in Stockholm County and controls.

METHOD: A total of 110 SSc patients (age 62 ± 12 years) fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for SSc and 105 gender- and age-matched controls participated in this study. A 12-lead resting electrocardiogram (ECG) was performed in all participants. The first 49 patients and 42 controls also underwent a 22-24-h Holter ECG recording. Associations with disease subsets, autoantibodies, cardiovascular risk factors, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), as estimated by echocardiography, were investigated.

RESULTS: Abnormal ECGs were found in 28% of patients and 17% of controls (p = 0.05). Atrioventricular (AV) and/or intraventricular (IV) conduction abnormalities were found in 15% of patients and 5% of controls (p < 0.01). Four patients, but no controls, had low anteroseptal R-wave/septal Q-wave patterns with narrow QRS complexes, simulating a septal wall infarction pattern. Patients had more abnormal Holter ECG recordings than controls (38% vs. 17%, p = 0.05). All participants with a normal resting ECG had an LVEF ≥ 50%.

CONCLUSIONS: Although ECGs are inexpensive, commonly available screening tools, to detect arrhythmias, such as frequent ventricular extrasystoles (VES), Holter tracings should be performed. The frequencies of AV and/or IV conduction abnormalities and septal Q waves/low R waves have not changed since 1985. The unmet need of anti-fibrotic treatment in SSc is underscored by these findings.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app