COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Surgical outcomes after intraocular lens implantation for posterior lenticonus-related cataract according to preoperative lens status.

PURPOSE: To address the surgical outcomes of pediatric patients with cataracts associated with posterior lenticonus who required cataract extraction and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation according to preoperative lens status.

SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Children's Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

DESIGN: Comparative case series.

METHODS: Patients who had cataract extraction and IOL implantation for posterior lenticonus were divided into 2 groups according to the preoperative lens status. Clinical features and visual outcomes in both groups were comparatively analyzed.

RESULTS: Forty-seven eyes of 43 patients were studied. Thirty-five eyes had lens opacities localized to the posterior pole, and 12 eyes presented with total opacity of the lens. Preexisting posterior capsule defect was identified intraoperatively in 11 eyes with total lens opacity. Eyes with preexisting posterior capsule defects more frequently required ciliary sulcus fixation of the IOL (P=.01). The mean follow-up after cataract extraction was 66.9 months ± 35.9 (SD). The mean final corrected distance visual acuity of patients with total opacity (0.37 ± 0.57 logMAR) was better than that of patients with posterior polar opacity (0.56 ± 0.50 logMAR), with borderline significance (P=.05).

CONCLUSIONS: A preexisting posterior capsule defect, found most often in eyes that presented with total lens opacity, could be an obstacle to capsular bag fixation of the IOL. Posterior lenticonus patients with total lens opacity had marginally significantly better visual outcomes than patients with posterior polar opacity.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app