Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Effect of birth weight on the association between necrotising enterocolitis and red blood cell transfusions in <=1500 g infants.

BMJ Open 2013 November 28
CONTEXT: Reports evaluating a possible association between necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) and blood transfusion have been predominantly case-control studies. As the possible associations of disease with any variable on which cases and controls have been matched cannot be explored, a cohort study would offer a solution to this problem.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the association between exposure to a packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion and development of NEC in a cohort where biases of matching are omitted.

DESIGN: In a retrospective cohort, exposed infants were defined as those who received a transfusion and did not develop NEC or developed NEC within 48 h of the transfusion. All others were considered unexposed.

SETTING: A single regional perinatal centre in Memphis, Tennessee, USA.

PATIENTS: 3060 ≤1500 g birth weights (BW) were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES: The relative risk of developing NEC after exposure to a PRBC transfusion was measured.

RESULTS: 3060 infants were identified. 174 infants (5.7%) developed NEC; 116 of the 174 infants (67%) were exposed. NEC infants had a significantly lower BW (924 vs 1042 g) and required a longer stay on a ventilator (7 vs 2 days). Divided into groups, infants with BW ≤750 , 751-1000 , 1001-1250 g and 1251-1500 g (n=52, 51, 46 and 25, respectively) had a relative risk of 0.14, 0.46, 1.83 and 1.78 (p<0.01, 0.02, 0.07 and 0.17), respectively, to develop NEC after an exposure. Infants with longest ventilator days were also significantly less likely to develop NEC after an exposure; relative risk=0.11 (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to transfusions was less likely associated with NEC in ≤1000 g infants and remained a risk factor in 1001-1500 infants. BW has to be factored in any study evaluating the association between PRBC transfusions and NEC.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app