We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Effect of negative-pressure wound therapy on open fractures of the lower limb.
Singapore Medical Journal 2013 November
INTRODUCTION: Early debridement and coverage has long been regarded as the standard of care for open fractures of the lower limb, as infection is a serious complication. However, the best time for wound closure remains controversial. Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is thought to result in reduced flap infection and failure. To determine the effect of NPWT, we reviewed patients with open fractures of the lower limb and compared the rates of infection and flap failure in two time-based cohorts.
METHODS: Two cohorts of patients (periods 2003-2004 and 2008-2009) with Gustilo type IIIB open tibial fractures were recruited and their outcomes were compared. In the 2003-2004 cohort, wounds were dressed with occlusive dressing. In the 2008-2009 cohort, all patients underwent NPWT. Data was retrospectively analysed with regard to infection, failure, age, type of flap, comorbidities and defect size. The incidences of infection and flap failure were further analysed for any statistical difference between the different treatment protocols.
RESULTS: In the 2003-2004 cohort, 33% of patients developed infection and 11% had flap failure. However, in the 2008-2009 cohort, 10% of patients developed infection and 6% had flap failure. The difference in the incidence of infection was statistically significant between the two cohorts (p = 0.029).
CONCLUSION: Patients in the 2008-2009 cohort had better outcomes, and we are of the opinion that performing NPWT may have contributed to this result.
METHODS: Two cohorts of patients (periods 2003-2004 and 2008-2009) with Gustilo type IIIB open tibial fractures were recruited and their outcomes were compared. In the 2003-2004 cohort, wounds were dressed with occlusive dressing. In the 2008-2009 cohort, all patients underwent NPWT. Data was retrospectively analysed with regard to infection, failure, age, type of flap, comorbidities and defect size. The incidences of infection and flap failure were further analysed for any statistical difference between the different treatment protocols.
RESULTS: In the 2003-2004 cohort, 33% of patients developed infection and 11% had flap failure. However, in the 2008-2009 cohort, 10% of patients developed infection and 6% had flap failure. The difference in the incidence of infection was statistically significant between the two cohorts (p = 0.029).
CONCLUSION: Patients in the 2008-2009 cohort had better outcomes, and we are of the opinion that performing NPWT may have contributed to this result.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app