We have located links that may give you full text access.
Is increased red cell distribution width an indicating marker of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and fibrotic stage?
World Journal of Gastroenterology : WJG 2013 November 15
AIM: To evaluate the red cell distribution width (RDW) as an indicator of the presence of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and its association with fibrotic scores.
METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out that included sixty-two biopsy proven NASH, 32 simple steatosis patients and 30 healthy controls. The correlation between the clinical and histopathological features of NASH patients and RDW values was evaluated. Liver fibrosis scores were measured using a 0 to 4 point scale and were divided in to two groups; fibrosis scores 0-1 were termed mild and fibrosis scores 2-4 were termed advanced fibrosis. RDW values were compared between NASH, simple steatosis and healthy controls. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the independent predicting factors for the presence of liver fibrosis caused by NASH.
RESULTS: Patients with NASH had higher RDW values compared with simple steatosis and healthy control groups [14.28% ± 0.25% vs 13.37% ± 0.12%, 12.96% ± 0.14% (P < 0.01), respectively]. Patients with advanced fibrosis had higher RDW values than the mild fibrosis group (15.86% ± 0.4% vs 13.63% ± 0.67%, P < 0.01, respectively). RDW also correlated with fibrotic scores (r = 0.579 and P < 0.01). The variables that were significant in the univariate analysis were evaluated in multivariate logistic regression analysis, and RDW was an independent predicting factor of NASH (OR = 1.75, 95%CI: 1.129-2.711, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: RDW a new non-invasive marker that can be used to demonstrate the presence of NASH and indicate advanced fibrotic scores.
METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out that included sixty-two biopsy proven NASH, 32 simple steatosis patients and 30 healthy controls. The correlation between the clinical and histopathological features of NASH patients and RDW values was evaluated. Liver fibrosis scores were measured using a 0 to 4 point scale and were divided in to two groups; fibrosis scores 0-1 were termed mild and fibrosis scores 2-4 were termed advanced fibrosis. RDW values were compared between NASH, simple steatosis and healthy controls. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the independent predicting factors for the presence of liver fibrosis caused by NASH.
RESULTS: Patients with NASH had higher RDW values compared with simple steatosis and healthy control groups [14.28% ± 0.25% vs 13.37% ± 0.12%, 12.96% ± 0.14% (P < 0.01), respectively]. Patients with advanced fibrosis had higher RDW values than the mild fibrosis group (15.86% ± 0.4% vs 13.63% ± 0.67%, P < 0.01, respectively). RDW also correlated with fibrotic scores (r = 0.579 and P < 0.01). The variables that were significant in the univariate analysis were evaluated in multivariate logistic regression analysis, and RDW was an independent predicting factor of NASH (OR = 1.75, 95%CI: 1.129-2.711, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: RDW a new non-invasive marker that can be used to demonstrate the presence of NASH and indicate advanced fibrotic scores.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app