Increased effectiveness of early therapy with anti-tumor necrosis factor-α vs an immunomodulator in children with Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Standard therapy for children newly diagnosed with Crohn's disease (CD) includes early administration of immunomodulators after initial treatment with corticosteroids. We compared the effectiveness of early (≤3 mo after diagnosis) treatment with an anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α with that of an immunomodulator in attaining clinical remission and facilitating growth of pediatric patients.

METHODS: We analyzed data from the RISK study, an observational research program that enrolled patients younger than age 17 diagnosed with inflammatory (nonpenetrating, nonstricturing) CD from 2008 through 2012 at 28 pediatric gastroenterology centers in North America. Patients were managed by physician dictate. From 552 children (median age, 11.8 y; 61% male; 63% with pediatric CD activity index scores >30; and median C-reactive protein level 5.6-fold the upper limit of normal), we used propensity score methodology to identify 68 triads of patients matched for baseline characteristics who were treated with early anti-TNFα therapy, early immunomodulator, or no early immunotherapy. We evaluated relationships among therapies, corticosteroid and surgery-free remission (pediatric CD activity index scores, ≤10), and growth at 1 year for 204 children. Treatment after 3 months was a covariate.

RESULTS: Early treatment with anti-TNFα was superior to early treatment with an immunomodulator (85.3% vs 60.3% in remission; relative risk, 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.75; P = .0017), whereas early immunomodulator therapy was no different than no early immunotherapy (60.3% vs 54.4% in remission; relative risk, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.83-1.48; P = .49) in achieving remission at 1 year. Accounting for therapy after 3 months, early treatment with anti-TNFα remained superior to early treatment with an immunomodulator (relative risk, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.20-1.89; P = .0004), whereas early immunomodulator therapy was no different than no early immunotherapy (relative risk, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.75-1.34; P = .99). The mean height z-score increased compared with baseline only in the early anti-TNFα group.

CONCLUSIONS: In children newly diagnosed with comparably severe CD, early monotherapy with anti-TNFα produced better overall clinical and growth outcomes at 1 year than early monotherapy with an immunomodulator. Further data will be required to best identify children most likely to benefit from early treatment with anti-TNFα therapy.