We have located links that may give you full text access.
Predictive value of 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in patients with suspicion of neuroendocrine tumors: is its routine use justified?
Clinical Nuclear Medicine 2014 January
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in patients with suspected neuroendocrine tumor (NET).
METHODS: Data of 164 patients (mean age, 42.5 ± 17.3 years; 54.8% male) who underwent Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for suspected NET were retrospectively analyzed. Neuroendocrine tumor was suspected based on clinical features (n = 94) and/or raised biochemical markers (n = 83, serum chromogranin A, gastrin, serum/urinary catecholamines, insulin/C-peptide, and 5-hydroxytrytophan/5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid) and/or imaging findings (n = 93). PET/CT images were reviewed by 2 experienced nuclear medicine physicians, and any nonphysiological Ga-DOTANOC uptake was taken as positive for NET. Histopathology (n = 55) and clinical/imaging follow-up (n = 109; median, 11 months) was used as reference standard.
RESULTS: Based on the reference standard, 97 of 164 patients had NET. Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT was positive for NET in 101 and negative in 63 patients. Primary tumor was demonstrated in 90 patients (commonest site-pancreas) and metastasis in 30 (commonest site-liver). PET/CT was true positive in 92 patients, true negative in 58, false positive in 9, and false negative in 5. The overall sensitivity was 94.8%, specificity was 86.5%, positive predictive value was 91%, negative predictive value was 92%, and accuracy was 91.4%. The accuracy of PET-CT in patients with clinical features of NET was 90.4%, with raised biochemical markers was 86.7%, and with imaging findings suggestive of NET was 93.5%. No difference was seen in the accuracy in patients with or without clinical symptoms (P = 0.794), raised versus those with normal/unknown biochemical markers (P = 0.094), and suggestive imaging versus those with negative/unavailable imaging (P = 0.420).
CONCLUSIONS: Ga-DOTANOC PET-CT shows high positive and negative predictive values in patients with suspected NET and can be routinely used for this purpose.
METHODS: Data of 164 patients (mean age, 42.5 ± 17.3 years; 54.8% male) who underwent Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for suspected NET were retrospectively analyzed. Neuroendocrine tumor was suspected based on clinical features (n = 94) and/or raised biochemical markers (n = 83, serum chromogranin A, gastrin, serum/urinary catecholamines, insulin/C-peptide, and 5-hydroxytrytophan/5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid) and/or imaging findings (n = 93). PET/CT images were reviewed by 2 experienced nuclear medicine physicians, and any nonphysiological Ga-DOTANOC uptake was taken as positive for NET. Histopathology (n = 55) and clinical/imaging follow-up (n = 109; median, 11 months) was used as reference standard.
RESULTS: Based on the reference standard, 97 of 164 patients had NET. Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT was positive for NET in 101 and negative in 63 patients. Primary tumor was demonstrated in 90 patients (commonest site-pancreas) and metastasis in 30 (commonest site-liver). PET/CT was true positive in 92 patients, true negative in 58, false positive in 9, and false negative in 5. The overall sensitivity was 94.8%, specificity was 86.5%, positive predictive value was 91%, negative predictive value was 92%, and accuracy was 91.4%. The accuracy of PET-CT in patients with clinical features of NET was 90.4%, with raised biochemical markers was 86.7%, and with imaging findings suggestive of NET was 93.5%. No difference was seen in the accuracy in patients with or without clinical symptoms (P = 0.794), raised versus those with normal/unknown biochemical markers (P = 0.094), and suggestive imaging versus those with negative/unavailable imaging (P = 0.420).
CONCLUSIONS: Ga-DOTANOC PET-CT shows high positive and negative predictive values in patients with suspected NET and can be routinely used for this purpose.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app