Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Rhythm outcome predictors after concomitant surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation: a 9-year, single-center experience.

OBJECTIVES: Concomitant surgical ablation is a safe and feasible procedure, recommended by the guidelines for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing cardiac surgery. We performed a single-center data analysis to identify the predictors of rhythm outcome in such patients.

METHODS: From January 2003 to January 2012, 503 patients with persistent (n = 296, 58.8%) or paroxysmal (n = 207, 41.2%) AF underwent concomitant surgical AF ablation. The lesions were limited to a pulmonary vein isolation (n = 76, 15.1%), a more complex left atrial lesion set (n = 353, 70.2%), or biatrial lesions (n = 74, 14.7%). Follow-up rhythm evaluations were based on either 24-hour Holter electrocardiograms or event recorder interrogation at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. A sinus rhythm (SR) immediately postoperatively was defined as the first documented rhythm after weaning from extracorporeal circulation.

RESULTS: The mean patient age was 68.0 ± 9.5 years, and 336 (66.8%) were men. No major ablation-related complications occurred. After 1 year of follow-up, 59.9% of all patients were in SR, with significantly better results in patients with paroxysmal AF than in those with persistent AF (67.3% vs 54.8%, P = .0053). Additional statistically significant factors influencing SR after 1 year were left atrial diameter (P = .0019), AF duration (P = .018), and immediate postoperative SR (P < .001). Regarding only patients with persistent or longstanding-persistent AF, those with biatrial lesions had significantly greater rates of conversion to SR than those with solitary left atrial ablation (SR, 64.9% vs 51.4%; P = .044) after 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS: The statistically significant predictors for SR after 1 year were left atrial diameter, AF duration, preoperative paroxysmal AF, immediate postoperative SR, and biatrial ablation for persistent AF.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app