Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Positive and negative design for nonconsensus protein-DNA binding affinity in the vicinity of functional binding sites.

Biophysical Journal 2013 October 2
Recent experiments provide an unprecedented view of protein-DNA binding in yeast and human genomes at single-nucleotide resolution. These measurements, performed over large cell populations, show quite generally that sequence-specific transcription regulators with well-defined protein-DNA consensus motifs bind only a fraction among all consensus motifs present in the genome. Alternatively, proteins in vivo often bind DNA regions lacking known consensus sequences. The rules determining whether a consensus motif is functional remain incompletely understood. Here we predict that genomic background surrounding specific protein-DNA binding motifs statistically modulates the binding of sequence-specific transcription regulators to these motifs. In particular, we show that nonconsensus protein-DNA binding in yeast is statistically enhanced, on average, around functional Reb1 motifs that are bound as compared to nonfunctional Reb1 motifs that are unbound. The landscape of nonconsensus protein-DNA binding around functional CTCF motifs in human demonstrates a more complex behavior. In particular, human genomic regions characterized by the highest CTCF occupancy, show statistically reduced level of nonconsensus protein-DNA binding. Our findings suggest that nonconsensus protein-DNA binding is fine-tuned around functional binding sites using a variety of design strategies.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app