We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Relationships between the importation, transmission, and nosocomial infections of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an observational study of 112 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.
Clinical Infectious Diseases 2014 January
BACKGROUND: The study of hospital methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) epidemiology is complicated by its transmissibility. Our objective was to understand how MRSA importation and transmission influence MRSA nosocomial infections in Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs).
METHODS: We performed hospital-level analyses of acute-care MRSA admission prevalence, acquisition rates, and incident nosocomial clinical culture (INCC) rates, each a surrogate measure of importation, transmission, and nosocomial infection, respectively. We studied 112 VAMCs from October 2007 through September 2010, after the start of a bundled intervention including active surveillance for MRSA. We analyzed data using generalized linear mixed models.
RESULTS: A total of 2.9 million surveillance tests were collected from 1.4 million patient admissions. Overall MRSA admission prevalence was 11.4%, acquisition was 5.2 per 1000 patient-days at risk, and INCC was 1.8 per 1000 patient-days at risk. A 10% increase in a hospital's average admission prevalence was associated with a 9.7% increase in its weekly acquisition rates (P < .001) and a 9.8% increase in its weekly INCC rates (P < .001). Significant decreases were observed in all 3 measures during the study period (P < .001). When INCC rates were stratified by nasal MRSA carriage at admission, a significant downward trend was observed only among those initially negative.
CONCLUSIONS: Measured associations between MRSA admission prevalence, acquisition rate, and INCC rate were consistent with the hypothesis that decreased acquisition led to decreased importation, which in turn further abated acquisition. The downward trend in INCC rate specifically among individuals with negative admission surveillance tests suggests that decreasing transmission contributed to lower rates of nosocomial MRSA infection.
METHODS: We performed hospital-level analyses of acute-care MRSA admission prevalence, acquisition rates, and incident nosocomial clinical culture (INCC) rates, each a surrogate measure of importation, transmission, and nosocomial infection, respectively. We studied 112 VAMCs from October 2007 through September 2010, after the start of a bundled intervention including active surveillance for MRSA. We analyzed data using generalized linear mixed models.
RESULTS: A total of 2.9 million surveillance tests were collected from 1.4 million patient admissions. Overall MRSA admission prevalence was 11.4%, acquisition was 5.2 per 1000 patient-days at risk, and INCC was 1.8 per 1000 patient-days at risk. A 10% increase in a hospital's average admission prevalence was associated with a 9.7% increase in its weekly acquisition rates (P < .001) and a 9.8% increase in its weekly INCC rates (P < .001). Significant decreases were observed in all 3 measures during the study period (P < .001). When INCC rates were stratified by nasal MRSA carriage at admission, a significant downward trend was observed only among those initially negative.
CONCLUSIONS: Measured associations between MRSA admission prevalence, acquisition rate, and INCC rate were consistent with the hypothesis that decreased acquisition led to decreased importation, which in turn further abated acquisition. The downward trend in INCC rate specifically among individuals with negative admission surveillance tests suggests that decreasing transmission contributed to lower rates of nosocomial MRSA infection.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app