Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A 1-year randomized controlled study of everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil with reduced-dose cyclosporine in maintenance heart transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to demonstrate noninferiority of everolimus with reduced cyclosporine (CsA) vs mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with reduced CsA in improving renal function.

METHODS: In this 1-year randomized, open-label, noninferiority study in maintenance heart transplant recipients with impaired renal function 70 patients received everolimus (n = 36) or MMF (n = 34) in combination with reduced CsA. The planned sample size was not reached as the study was prematurely discontinued due to slow recruitment.

RESULTS: Noninferiority of the everolimus regimen could not be shown: In the total population MMF seemed to be favorable on renal function assessed by serum creatinine and filtration rates, but not in the subset of patients who reached the intended reduced CsA level. Incidence rates of rejection episodes were significantly higher under MMF at month 6 (P = .0332).

CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results of this trial using reduced CsA in combination with either everolimus or MMF show that there is evidence to reduce the CsA level when everolimus is given concomitantly and that the benefit of MMF with reduced CsA levels is limited due to insufficient immunosuppression.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app