JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Interim PET response criteria in paediatric non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Results from a retrospective multicenter reading.

AIM: To evaluate the use and reliability of the PET-based response criteria for interim PET (iPET) in terms of interobserver variability in pediatric and adolescent patients suffering from non-Hodgkin´s lymphoma (NHL). Particular attention was given to the identification of visual cutoff to separate patients with a favourable outcome.

PATIENTS, METHODS: Retrospective analysis of PET-datasets of 18 children and adolescents suffering from NHL who underwent iPET after two cycles of chemotherapy for response assessment. Datasets were evaluated and rated in three independent review centers (RC) (blinded-read, intra-center consensus) using a visual 5-point response scale. Ratings were compared to clinical outcome. Pairwise interobserver agreement was analysed with Cohen's kappa-test (κ). Overall agreement (between attended RCs) was assessed with Fleiss' κ-test.

RESULTS: Four patients suffered relapse (early, n = 2; late, n = 2). Per region analyses on interobserver variability revealed a "substantial" agreement (Fleiss' κ = 0.618). Per patient analyses revealed concordant iPET-ratings in eight patients: iPET-negative (iPET-), n = 5; iPET-positive (iPET+), n = 2; iPET-inconclusive (iPET±), n = 1. Discordant ratings were found in the remaining patients. Patients with early relapse were concordantly identified using mediastinal blood pool structures (MBPS, score ≥ 3) as visual cutoff between iPET+ or iPET-, respectively. However, patients with late relapse were not concordantly identified taking the MBPS as visual cutoff.

CONCLUSION: The iPET interpretation using a dedicated PET-based response scale assured a low interobserver variability in per-region but not in per-patient analyses in a multicenter read. Using a sensitive read out (iPET+, score ≥ 3) a reliable identification of patients suffering relapse was limited to those with early relapse.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app