JOURNAL ARTICLE

Hybrid [¹⁸F]-FDG PET/MRI including non-Gaussian diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI): preliminary results in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Philipp Heusch, Jens Köhler, Hans-Joerg Wittsack, Till A Heusner, Christian Buchbender, Thorsten D Poeppel, Felix Nensa, Axel Wetter, Thomas Gauler, Verena Hartung, Rotem S Lanzman
European Journal of Radiology 2013, 82 (11): 2055-60
23830904

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of non-Gaussian DWI as part of a FDG-PET/MRI protocol in patients with histologically proven non-small cell lung cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: 15 consecutive patients with histologically proven NSCLC (mean age 61 ± 11 years) were included in this study and underwent whole-body FDG-PET/MRI following whole-body FDG-PET/CT. As part of the whole-body FDG-PET/MRI protocol, an EPI-sequence with 5 b-values (0, 100, 500, 1000 and 2000 s/mm(2)) was acquired for DWI of the thorax during free-breathing. Volume of interest (VOI) measurements were performed to determine the maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUV(max); SUV(mean)). A region of interest (ROI) was manually drawn around the tumor on b=0 images and then transferred to the corresponding parameter maps to assess ADC(mono), D(app) and K(app). To assess the goodness of the mathematical fit R(2) was calculated for monoexponential and non-Gaussian analysis. Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated to compare SUV values and diffusion coefficients. A Student's t-test was performed to compare the monoexponential and non-Gaussian diffusion fitting (R(2)).

RESULTS: T staging was equal between FDG-PET/CT and FDG-PET/MRI in 12 of 15 patients. For NSCLC, mean ADC(mono) was 2.11 ± 1.24 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, Dapp was 2.46 ± 1.29 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s and mean Kapp was 0.70 ± 0.21. The non-Gaussian diffusion analysis (R(2)=0.98) provided a significantly better mathematical fitting to the DWI signal decay than the monoexponetial analysis (R(2)=0.96) (p<0.001). SUV(max) and SUV(mean) of NSCLC was 13.5 ± 7.6 and 7.9 ± 4.3 for FDG-PET/MRI. ADC(mono) as well as Dapp exhibited a significant inverse correlation with the SUV(max) (ADC(mono): R=-0.67; p<0.01; Dapp: R=-0.69; p<0.01) as well as with SUV(mean) assessed by FDG-PET/MRI (ADC(mono): R=-0.66; p<0.01; Dapp: R=-0.69; p<0.01). Furthermore, Kapp exhibited a significant correlation with SUV(max) (R=0.72; p<0.05) and SUV(mean) as assessed by FDG-PET/MRI (R=0.71; p<0.005).

CONCLUSION: Simultaneous PET and non-Gaussian diffusion acquisitions are feasible. Non-Gaussian diffusion parameters show a good correlation with SUV and might provide additional information beyond monoexponential ADC, especially as non-Gaussian diffusion exhibits better mathematical fitting to the decay of the diffusion signal than monoexponential DWI.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
23830904
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"