We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Systematic Review
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of an ankle-foot orthosis on gait biomechanics after stroke.
Clinical Rehabilitation 2013 October
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence on the effects of an ankle-foot orthosis on gait biomechanics after stroke.
DATA SOURCES: The following databases were searched; AMED, CINHAL, Cochrane Library (Stroke section), Medline, PubMed, Science Direct and Scopus. Previous reviews, reference lists and citation tracking of the selected articles were screened and the authors of selected trials contacted for any further unpublished data.
REVIEW METHODS: Controlled trials of an ankle-foot orthosis on gait biomechanics in stroke survivors were identified. A modified PEDro score evaluated trial quality; those scoring 4/8 or more were selected. Information on the trial design, population, intervention, outcomes, and mean and standard deviation values for the treatment and control groups were extracted. Continuous outcomes were pooled according to their mean difference and 95% confidence intervals in a fixed-effect model.
RESULTS: Twenty trials involving 314 participants were selected. An ankle-foot orthosis had a positive effect on ankle kinematics (P < 0.00001-0.0002); knee kinematics in stance phase (P < 0.0001-0.01); kinetics (P = 0.0001) and energy cost (P = 0.004), but not on knee kinematics in swing phase (P = 0.84), hip kinematics (P < 0.18-0.89) or energy expenditure (P = 0.43). There were insufficient data for pooled analysis of individual joint moments, muscle activity or spasticity. All trials, except one, evaluated immediate effects only.
CONCLUSIONS: An ankle-foot orthosis can improve the ankle and knee kinematics, kinetics and energy cost of walking in stroke survivors.
DATA SOURCES: The following databases were searched; AMED, CINHAL, Cochrane Library (Stroke section), Medline, PubMed, Science Direct and Scopus. Previous reviews, reference lists and citation tracking of the selected articles were screened and the authors of selected trials contacted for any further unpublished data.
REVIEW METHODS: Controlled trials of an ankle-foot orthosis on gait biomechanics in stroke survivors were identified. A modified PEDro score evaluated trial quality; those scoring 4/8 or more were selected. Information on the trial design, population, intervention, outcomes, and mean and standard deviation values for the treatment and control groups were extracted. Continuous outcomes were pooled according to their mean difference and 95% confidence intervals in a fixed-effect model.
RESULTS: Twenty trials involving 314 participants were selected. An ankle-foot orthosis had a positive effect on ankle kinematics (P < 0.00001-0.0002); knee kinematics in stance phase (P < 0.0001-0.01); kinetics (P = 0.0001) and energy cost (P = 0.004), but not on knee kinematics in swing phase (P = 0.84), hip kinematics (P < 0.18-0.89) or energy expenditure (P = 0.43). There were insufficient data for pooled analysis of individual joint moments, muscle activity or spasticity. All trials, except one, evaluated immediate effects only.
CONCLUSIONS: An ankle-foot orthosis can improve the ankle and knee kinematics, kinetics and energy cost of walking in stroke survivors.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app