Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Characteristic features of pulmonary function test, CT volume analysis and MR perfusion imaging in COPD patients with different HRCT phenotypes.

INTRODUCTION: Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can provide detailed anatomic structures and quantitative function information for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively clarify characteristics of pulmonary function test (PFT), CT volume parameters and magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion imaging in COPD patients with different high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) phenotypes.

METHODS: Sixty-two patients performed PFT, CT and MR perfusion imaging. COPD was classified into three phenotypes according to HRCT quantitative findings: A, E and M phenotype. Total lung volume (TLV), total emphysema volume (TEV) and emphysema index (EI) were quantitated by HRCT. In cases of perfusion defects (PDs), the shape and size were evaluated. The contrast between the normal lung and PDs was quantified by calculating their signal intensity ratio (RSI  = SIPD /SInormal ). The correlation was performed between PFT, CT and MR perfusion.

RESULTS: There were 42 A phenotype, 9 E phenotype and 11 M phenotype. There was significant difference in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) between A and M phenotype (P < 0.05). TEV and EI of A phenotype (0.4 ± 0.4 L and 8.0% ± 4.3%) were lower than those of E (1.0 ± 0.3 L and 18.6% ± 3.2%) or M phenotype (0.9 ± 0.2 L and 17.5% ± 1.7%). MR perfusion images showed circumscribed or diffuse patchy PDs. RSI of A phenotype was higher than that of E phenotype (20.3% ± 8.5% vs 11.8% ± 5.4%; P = 0.006). TEV and EI were moderate negatively correlated with diffusion function parameters. RSI was strongly correlated with FEV1% (A) and FEV1/FVC (M). FEV1/FVC was strongly correlated with TEV or EI (E).

CONCLUSION: There were different features and correlations between PFT, CT volume and MR perfusion in different phenotype, indicating each phenotype may have novel imaging method guiding clinical management.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app