COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Optical coherence tomography in paediatric glaucoma: time domain versus spectral domain.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Spectral-domain (SD)- Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) can track eye movements, has faster acquisition time and higher resolution than time-domain(TD)-OCT. The aim of the study was to assess the utility of SD-OCT in paediatric glaucoma and determine its agreement with TD-OCT.

METHODS: Children who had SD-OCT(Spectralis, Heidelberg-Engineering,Germany) were retrospectively and prospectively identified from Duke paediatric glaucoma clinic. The peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) and macular thickness and volume (MV) were compared amongst four groups: normal eyes, eyes with physiologic cupping (C:D >0.5 and <0.8, IOP <21), mild glaucomatous eyes (C:D <0.5, intra-ocular pressure (IOP) >21) and severe glaucoma (C:D>0.5, IOP>21). SD-OCT values were compared to TD-OCT(OCT-3, Carl-Zeiss-Meditec, Dublin, CA) values in a subset of subjects who had same day scans using both instruments. Children with neurologic disorders, refractive error >±5D, pseudophakia and prematurity were excluded.

RESULTS: Included were 83 eyes of 83 children, mean age 11.9 ± 4.2 years. SD-OCT measurements of average RNFL thickness and MV differed among normals(n=24), physiologically cupped (n=31), mild (n=15) versus severe glaucoma (n=13): (RNFL:104 ± 9, 99 ± 6, 98 ± 9 vs 62 ± 18 µm, respectively, p<0.05; MV: 8.7 ± 0.3, 8.6 ± 0.3, 8.8 ± 0.4 vs 8.0 ± 0.6 mm³;, respectively, p<0.05). Same-day SD-OCT and TD-OCT measures in 53 eyes correlated linearly (RNFL r(2)=0.88; MVr(2)=0.58). SD-OCT measured lower RNFL and higher macular thickness than TD-OCT. Among eyes with severe glaucoma, 4 of 13 (30%) had unreliable TD-OCT but reliable SD-OCT.

CONCLUSIONS: SD-OCT was easier to obtain than TD-OCT in children. SD-OCT and TD-OCT measurements correlated, but values were not interchangeable.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app