We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
VALIDATION STUDIES
Spectral-cepstral estimation of dysphonia severity: external validation.
Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology 2013 January
OBJECTIVES: The current study applied an acoustic algorithm incorporating measures from cepstral and spectral analyses, the Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia (CSID), in an attempt to externally validate the CSID as an acoustic estimate of dysphonia severity.
METHODS: Correlation (Pearson's r) between the CSID and trained listener-perceived severities as rated on the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) was calculated from sentence and sustained vowel samples from 56 patients before or after they underwent thyroid surgery.
RESULTS: A strong correlation was identified between the mean CSID values calculated across CAPE-V sentences and vowels and the median rating of perceived overall severity (r = 0.82; p < 0.001). The CSID values did not differ significantly from their corresponding auditory-perceptual ratings of dysphonia severity for these samples (CSID: mean, 15.54, SD, 16.63; CAPE-V Severity: mean, 17.33, SD, 13.61; p = 0.16).
CONCLUSIONS: Independent testing of an acoustic algorithm incorporating measures from cepstral and spectral analyses (the CSID) confirmed a strong correlation of the CSID to perceptual ratings of overall voice quality. This study provides external validation of the CSID as a robust correlate of dysphonia severity as rated by trained listeners.
METHODS: Correlation (Pearson's r) between the CSID and trained listener-perceived severities as rated on the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) was calculated from sentence and sustained vowel samples from 56 patients before or after they underwent thyroid surgery.
RESULTS: A strong correlation was identified between the mean CSID values calculated across CAPE-V sentences and vowels and the median rating of perceived overall severity (r = 0.82; p < 0.001). The CSID values did not differ significantly from their corresponding auditory-perceptual ratings of dysphonia severity for these samples (CSID: mean, 15.54, SD, 16.63; CAPE-V Severity: mean, 17.33, SD, 13.61; p = 0.16).
CONCLUSIONS: Independent testing of an acoustic algorithm incorporating measures from cepstral and spectral analyses (the CSID) confirmed a strong correlation of the CSID to perceptual ratings of overall voice quality. This study provides external validation of the CSID as a robust correlate of dysphonia severity as rated by trained listeners.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app