JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

A prospective randomized trial comparing image quality, study interpretability, and radiation dose of narrow acquisition window with widened acquisition window protocols in prospectively ECG-triggered coronary computed tomography angiography

Jonathon Leipsic, Troy M LaBounty, Amr M Ajlan, James P Earls, E Strovski, Mark Madden, David A Wood, Cameron J Hague, Rohan Poulter, Kelly Branch, Ricardo C Cury, Brett Heilbron, Carolyn Taylor, Gilat Grunau, Lawrence Haiducu, James K Min
Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography 2013, 7 (1): 18-24
23452996

BACKGROUND: Prospectively triggered coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) is commonly performed with a widened acquisition window to provide flexibility in image reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a randomized controlled trial to determine whether the use of a narrow acquisition window in prospectively triggered coronary CTA would allow lower radiation dose while preserving image quality and interpretability.

METHODS: Prospective 2-center 2- platform randomized trial that evaluated 205 consecutive patients 96 with widened acquisition (WA) and 109 narrow acquisition (NA) referred for coronary CTA in sinus rhythm and heart rate <65 beats/min. Patients scanned with WA had phases reconstructed at 5% intervals, and each phase was assigned an individual study ID. Images were reviewed with individual phase reconstructions interpreted randomly by 2 level 3 readers with a third for consensus. Images were evaluated with a 5-point Likert scale on a per-vessel basis (best score on any phase). Scores were then dichotomized into diagnostic (score 3-5) compared with nondiagnostic (score 1-2). Readers also reported obstructive coronary artery disease on a per-patient basis. Agreement for the diagnosis of obstructive disease and per-artery interpretability was performed. Signal and noise measurements were also performed.

RESULTS: No difference in demographics between groups (P = NS). The signal-to-noise ratio was comparable 12.99 ± 3.4 NA and 12.53 ± 4.13 for the WA (P = 0.45). The median effective dose was 1.78 mSv for NA compared with 3.26 mSv for WA (P < 0.001). Image quality, diagnostic interpretability, interreader agreement, and downstream testing were not significantly different between the 2 groups (P= NS for all).

CONCLUSIONS: Coronary CTA with NA resulted in a 47% lower radiation dose without significant difference in study interpretability or image quality or increased downstream resource use or testing.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
23452996
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"