COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Clinical significance of ¹⁸F-α-methyl tyrosine PET/CT for the detection of bone marrow invasion in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: comparison with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and MRI.

OBJECTIVE: L-3-[(18)F]-fluoro-α-methyl tyrosine ((18)F-FAMT) is an amino acid tracer for positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) which specifically transported into cancer cells by L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1). LAT1 overexpression in tumors is significantly correlated with cell proliferation and angiogenesis. (18)F-FAMT PET/CT, fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) PET/CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were compared for their diagnostic performance in the detection of bone marrow invasion in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with OSCC on the upper or lower alveolar ridge underwent staging by MRI, (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (18)F-FAMT PET/CT studies before surgery. Post-surgical pathologic examination was used as the standard to determine the final diagnoses. The possibility of bone marrow invasion on MRI, (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (18)F-FAMT PET/CT were usually graded retrospectively into five-point score. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated according to the obtained scores.

RESULTS: As the sensitivity of (18)F-FDG PET/CT was highest (100 %) among that of MRI (95 %) and (18)F-FAMT PET/CT (90 %), the specificity of (18)F-FAMT PET/CT was highest (85.7 %) among that of MRI (57 %) and (18)F-FDG PET/CT (14.3 %). The size of pathological tumor was accorded with that detected by (18)F-FAMT PET/CT and was smaller than that detected by (18)F-FDG PET/CT (P < 0.01). Significant difference was not found between (18)F-FAMT PET tumor volume and pathological tumor volume.

CONCLUSIONS: (18)F-FAMT PET/CT was useful and more specific than MRI or (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of bone marrow invasion of OSCC and may contribute to minimize the extent of resection in oral surgery patient.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app