Comparative Study
Journal Article
Validation Study
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The patient simple clinical colitis activity index (P-SCCAI) can detect ulcerative colitis (UC) disease activity in remission: a comparison of the P-SCCAI with clinician-based SCCAI and biological markers.

AIM: To develop a patient-based Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (P-SCCAI) of ulcerative colitis (UC) activity and to compare it with the clinician-based SCCAI, C-reactive protein (CRP) and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of UC activity. Monitoring UC activity may give patients disease control and prevent unnecessary examinations.

METHODS: Consecutive UC patients randomly completed the P-SCCAI either before or after consultation. Gastroenterologists assessed patients' UC activity on the same day. Overall agreement between SCCAI and P-SCCAI was calculated with Spearman's Rho and Mann-Whitney U test. Agreement regarding active disease versus remission and agreement at domain level were calculated by percent agreement and kappa (κ).

RESULTS: 149 (response rate 84.7%) UC patients participated. P-SCCAI and SCCAI showed a large correlation (rs=0.79). The medians (IQR) of the P-SCCAI (3.78;0-15) tended to be higher than those of the SCCAI (2.86;0-13), although this difference did not reach statistical significance (z=1.71| p=0.088). In 77% of the cases the difference between clinicians' and patients' scores was not clinically different (i.e.≤2). Percentage agreement between clinicians and patients, judging UC as active or in remission, was 87%, rs=0.66, κ=0.66, indicating a substantial agreement. In general patients tended to report more physical symptoms than clinicians. C-Reactive protein (CRP) was found to have a significant association with both P-SCCAI and SCCAI (κ=0.32, κ=0.39 respectively) as was PGA (κ=0.73 for both indices).

CONCLUSIONS: The P-SCCAI is a promising tool given its substantial agreement with the SCCAI and its feasibility. Therefore, P-SCCAI can complement SCCAI in clinical care and research.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app