Precision of pulmonary vein diameter measurements assessed by CE-MRA and steady-state-free precession imaging.

OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary vein (PV) diameter assessment is important for planning and follow-up of PV ablation in atrial fibrillation. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate inter- and intraobserver reliability of PV diameter measurements by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) and ECG-gated 2D multislice unenhanced steady-state-free precession sequences (multislice SSFP).

METHODS: Sixty PV diameters in 17 consecutive patients were measured in transverse and coronal orientation with CE-MRA and multislice SSFP by two observers. Statistics to evaluate inter- and intraobserver reliability included Bland-Altman analysis and F-test.

RESULTS: Intraobserver limits of agreement (LAG) ranged between ±0.50 cm (transverse) and ±0.86 cm (coronal) for CE-MRA versus ±0.40 cm (transverse) and ±0.67 cm (coronal) for multislice SSFP. Interobserver agreement showed LAG ranging between ±0.59 cm (transverse) and ±0.83 cm (coronal) for CE-MRA versus ±0.34 cm (transverse) and ±0.75 cm (coronal) for multislice SSFP. Intra- and interobserver variances did not reveal significant differences between CE-MRA and multislice SSFP in any orientation (all p-values >0.05).

CONCLUSION: Multislice SSFP and CE-MRA enable comparable precision of PV diameter measurements. However, both methods reveal a wide range of intra- and interobserver agreement, which has to be thoroughly considered in clinical use.

KEY POINTS: • Unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging can now provide measurement of pulmonary vein diameters • Steady-state-free precession offers a new method of performing unenhanced MR imaging • Both unenhanced and enhanced MRI measurements show wide intra- and interobserver variation • PV diameter measurements assessed by MRI have to be interpreted with care • Nevertheless, unenhanced MRI might replace some CT examinations for pulmonary vein demonstration.