Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Improvement in pelvic pain with botulinum toxin type A - Single vs. repeat injections.

The aim of this prospective study was to report the outcomes of pain and vaginal pressures of successive botulinum toxin type A injections for women with objective pelvic floor muscle overactivity and a two-year history of pelvic pain. Between 2005 and 2008, 37 women underwent injection of 100 IU of botulinum toxin type A into the puborectalis and pubococcygeous muscles with dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, dyschesia, and non-menstrual pelvic pain assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and vaginal pressure measured by vaginal manometry, at 0, 4, 12 and 26 weeks from each injection. 26 women (70%) had one injection of botulinum toxin type A and 11 (30%) had 2 or more injections. The second injection was performed at the earliest at 26 weeks after the first, with subsequent injections having a median time to re-injection of 33.4 weeks (range 9.4-122.7 weeks). Single and repeated injections both demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in dyspareunia by VAS scores from 54 to 30 in the single injection group and from 51 to 23 in the multiple injection group (p = .001), non-menstrual pelvic pain VAS from 37 to 25 (p = .04), as well as vaginal pressures; 40 versus 34 cm H(2)O (p = .02). No statistically significant difference in dysmenorrhoea or dyschesia was observed for either group from their baseline scores. Multiple injections of botulinum toxin type A in women with pelvic floor muscle overactivity provide significant relief from dyspareunia and non-menstrual pelvic pain. The upper limit between re-injection is not yet determined, nor is the maximum number of treatments. Clinical outcomes for single and subsequent injection of botulinum toxin type A for recurrent pelvic pain are equivalent. Women who have had benefit from a single injection of botulinum toxin type A can be reassured that if symptoms reoccur, repeated injections can be expected to be equally efficacious.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app