COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of two different absorbable membranes for the coverage of lateral osteotomy sites in maxillary sinus augmentation: a preliminary study.

INTRODUCTION: Barrier membranes, both absorbable and non-absorbable, have been used in sinus augmentation for many years. Some years ago, a new autologous blood substrate called Platelet-Rich-Fibrin (PRF) was introduced, and to date, the supporting effect on bone regeneration has been controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of PRF on bone regeneration when used as a barrier membrane at the lateral osteotomy site in sinus augmentation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve sinuses from six patients requiring bilateral sinus floor augmentation were treated with a two-stage surgical technique using sinus augmentation and implant placement after 5 months. The sinuses were grafted with autologous bone and bone-substitute material (Bio-Oss(®)) mixed in a 1:1 ratio and were covered in a randomized split-mouth design with a PRF or a conventional collagen membrane (Bio-Gide(®)), respectively. Five months later threaded titanium dental implants were inserted and bone specimens harvested with a trephine burr were evaluated histomorphometrically.

RESULTS: Bone quality seemed to be equal at both sites of the grafted sinuses. Mean vital bone formation after 5 months was 17.0% and 17.2%, for the PRF and collagen sites, respectively. The mean of residual bone-substitute was 15.9% and 17.3% for PRF and collagen, respectively. No local complications, such as dehiscences or membrane exposures, were detected at either site in any of the treated patients. After 12 months all implants reached primary stability in the augmented maxillary sinus floor without any peri-implant tissue inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of the study the coverage of the lateral sinus window with two different absorbable membranes has been shown to result in a similar amount of vital bone formation and residual bone-substitute.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app