JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

MR-proANP and MR-proADM for risk stratification of patients with acute chest pain.

Heart 2013 March
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) and mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) as prognostic biomarkers in a representative 'real world' cohort of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

DESIGN: Prospective observational multicentre cohort study.

SETTING: Chest pain units of three major hospitals in Germany from 2007 to 2008.

PATIENTS: Patients presenting with signs and symptoms suggestive of an ACS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary end point was death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and secondary end point was death, non-fatal MI, stroke, need for coronary revascularisation, and hospital admission for cardiovascular cause or acute heart failure within 6 months after enrolment.

RESULTS: 1386 patients (male/female = 920/466) were enrolled. Follow-up information was available for 97.8% of patients (median follow-up time 183 days). Forty-three patients reached the primary end point, and 132 the secondary end point. Patients who reached a primary end point had significantly higher MR-proANP (271 vs 101 pmol/l, p < 0.001) and MR-proADM (0.86 vs 0.59 nmol/l, p < 0.001) concentrations than those who did not. Cox regression analysis revealed a 2.55-fold risk of death or non fatal MI (95% CI 1.48 to 2.46, p < 0.001) for an increment of the log-transformed MR-proANP concentration by 1 SD after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, and a 1.91-fold risk (95% CI 1.48 to 2.46, p < 0.001) for MR-proADM. Both peptides could result in significant reclassification of patients when added to the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score, with an overall net reclassification improvement of 41.2% for MR-proADM and 35.7% for MR-proANP.

CONCLUSIONS: MR-proADM and MR-proANP are predictors of future cardiovascular events in patients presenting with acute chest pain and might facilitate the choice of treatment in those patients complementary to established risk scores.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app