OPEN IN READ APP
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Differences in hemodynamic parameters and exercise capacity between patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic heart failure

Ryo Nishio, Hidekazu Tanaka, Yasunori Tsuboi, Hiroto Kinutani, Yu Taniguchi, Mayumi Shigeru, Ryuji Toh, Yasushi Miura, Yoshitada Sakai, Noriaki Emoto, Hiroya Kawai, Ken-ichi Hirata
Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention 2012, 32 (6): 379-85
23143688

INTRODUCTION: Although pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic heart failure (CHF) lead to exercise limitation, their pathophysiology is different. Our objective was to evaluate, using right heart catheterization and cardiopulmonary exercise testing, the difference in hemodynamic parameters and exercise capacity between PAH and CHF, which have the same subjective symptoms.

METHODS: We studied 20 PAH (mean pulmonary artery pressure: 36 ± 10 mmHg, all . 25 mmHg) and 20 CHF (ejection fraction: 35 ± 10%, all < 40%) patients who underwent both cardiopulmonary exercise testing and right heart catheterization. All patients were in New York Heart Association functional class II or III.

RESULTS: Peak oxygen uptake (VO(2)) was lower for PAH patients than for CHF patients (11.7 ± 3.2 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1) vs 14.5 ± 4.6 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1), P = .03), while the slope of ventilation to carbon dioxide production ratio (VE/VCO(2)) was higher for PAH patients than for CHF patients (41.0 ± 12.7 vs 28.0 ± 9.0, P = .001), despite the similarity in their New York Heart Association functional class. Peak VO(2) and VE/VCO(2) correlated with cardiac index for both groups. An important finding was that peak VO(2) correlated with pulmonary vascular resistance for PAH patients (r = 20.46, P = .04) but not for CHF patients (r = 0.33, P = .15). Furthermore, peak VO(2) correlated with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure for CHF patients (r = 20.47, P = .03) but not for PAH patients (r = 0.17, P = .47), while the VE/VCO(2) slope correlated with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (r = 0.67, P = .002) but not with pulmonary vascular resistance (r = 0.12, P = .63) for CHF patients.

CONCLUSION: Peak VO(2) and VE/VCO(2) slope were worse for PAH patients than for CHF patients despite the similar subjective symptoms. This difference might be explained by an altered hemodynamic status.

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Available on the App Store

Available on the Play Store
Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
23143688
×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"