JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Clinical outcome of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli bacteremia in an area with high endemicity.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the impact of discordant empirical antibiotic therapy on the outcome of bacteremia caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli.

METHODS: The clinical features and outcomes of a cohort of patients hospitalized with ESBL E. coli bacteremia between 2007 and 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. The effect of different antimicrobial regimens on patient outcomes was analyzed.

RESULTS: ESBL E. coli accounted for 24.2% (207/857) of E. coli bacteremia cases. The urinary tract (43.6%) was the most common source of infection, followed by the hepatobiliary tract (23.0%). Discordant empirical antibiotic therapy was given to 52.0% patients. Admission to the intensive care unit was associated with the use of a carbapenem as empirical antibiotic therapy (p<0.001). Univariate analysis revealed no significant differences in 30-day mortality rates between patients receiving concordant and discordant empirical antibiotic therapy (23.5% vs. 19.8%, p=0.526), carbapenem and non-carbapenem empirical antibiotic therapy (29.8% vs. 19.1%, p=0.118), beta-lactam/beta-lactam inhibitor combinations (BLBLIs) and non-BLBLIs empirical antibiotic therapy (20.3% vs. 22.3%, p=0.734), cephalosporin and non-cephalosporin empirical antibiotic therapy (19.7% vs. 22.6%, p=0.639), and fluoroquinolone and non-fluoroquinolone empirical antibiotic therapy (8.3% vs. 22.4%, p=0.251). The findings were confirmed by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high proportion of discordant empirical antibiotic therapy, ESBL production had little effect on 30-day mortality. Whether the observation can be applied to different ESBL types is unknown and warrants further study.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app