EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Analysis of the distribution of bacteria within urinary catheter biofilms using four different molecular techniques.

BACKGROUND: Most nosocomial urinary tract infections are associated with the long-term use of urinary catheters. Such urinary catheter-associated infections are caused by bacteria that reside in biofilms. We determined the distribution of fastidious/nonculturable bacteria in biofilm of urinary catheters and evaluated the availability of concurrent applying various molecular techniques.

METHODS: The biofilms were isolated from urinary catheters that had been installed in patients for 3 or 4 weeks and examined by the following 4 different 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) analysis techniques: capillary electrophoresis, terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP), denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), and pyrosequencing.

RESULTS: A total of 329 isolates was identified by capillary electrophoresis. The most common genera were Edwardsiella, Enterobacter, Escherichia, and Pseudomonas. A total of 32 bacterial strains was identified by T-RFLP. Escherichia, Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, Moraxella, Proteus, Serratia, and Yersinia were the most represented genera. Similarly, Escherichia, Pseudomonas, and Enterobacter were the most prevalent according to DGGE. Burkholderia, Corynebacterium, Achromobacter, Alcaligenes, Citrobacter, Stenotrophomonas, and Streptococcus were also detected. Escherichia and Pseudomonas were abundantly detected by pyrosequencing. Enterobacter, Bacteroides, Klebsiella, Corynebacterium were also seen.

CONCLUSION: These 4 techniques detected different kinds of bacteria, suggesting that the simultaneous application of multiple techniques is necessary to accurately detect fastidious/nonculturable bacteria. Because bacterial growth within urinary catheter biofilms may be associated with urinary tract infections, further comprehensive studies are required.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app