[Use sagittal reconstruction CT for making decisions regarding the surgical strategy for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament].

OBJECTIVE: Use sagittal reconstruction CT to verify the surgical strategy for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

METHODS: A retrospective study of 161 patients (106 males and 55 females) who had undergone surgery for OPLL from July 2007 to November 2010 was performed. The mean age at surgery was 54.5 years (range from 26 to 77 years). The mean follow-up period was 28 months (12 - 54 months). There were 40 patients accept anterior approach surgeries (anterior group) which include 14 cases of anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion and 26 cases of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. There were 120 patients accept posterior approach surgeries (posterior group) which was spinous process-splitting laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy using coralline hydroxyapatite. One patient accepted combined anterior and posterior approach. According to the sagittal reconstruction CT, the main reason for spinal cord compression was cervical disc herniation in anterior group, and OPLL in posterior group. The level of spinal cord compression was 1 to 2 levels in anterior group, and 1 to 5 levels in posterior group with a major of 2 to 4 levels. As the classification of OPLL, segmental type and circumscribed type were major of segmental type in anterior group and all of the four types were in posterior group, the distribution of each type was average. The patients of posterior group were classified into two groups according to the modified K-line classification, and clinical results were compared between the two groups. The modified K-line was defined as a line that connects the midpoints of the spinal canal at C(2) and C(7) on sagittal CT myelography. Compression to the spinal cord did not exceed the K-line in the modified K-line(+) group and did exceed it in the modified K-line(-) group. Clinical data were compared using t-test or χ(2) test. Correlation analysis was used to determine the relationships of C(2)-C(7) angulation between sagittal reconstruction CT and neutral position X-ray.

RESULTS: The patient of anterior group had better recovery rate of the JOA score (72% ± 27%) than the posterior group (59% ± 35%) at the latest follow-up (t = 2.238, P = 0.027). In posterior group, the patients of modified K-line(+) group had better recovery rate of the JOA score (63% ± 37%) than the K-line(-) group (49% ± 30%) at the latest follow up (t = 2.150, P = 0.034). The C(2)-C(7) angulation on sagittal reconstruction CT was 11° ± 9° which has significantly correlated with the C(2)-C(7) angulation on neutral position X-ray which was 10° ± 10° (r = 0.947, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: Considering the selection of surgical approach, it should be combined with the main clinical diagnosis for spinal cord compression, the level of compression, the classification of OPLL and the kyphotic alignment of the cervical spine. The modified K-line is a simple and practical tool for making decisions regarding the surgical strategy for cervical OPLL patients.