We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
RESEARCH SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.
Ambulation and balance outcomes measure different aspects of recovery in individuals with chronic, incomplete spinal cord injury.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012 September
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate relationships among ambulation and balance outcome measures over time for incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) after locomotor training, in order to facilitate the selection of effective and sensitive rehabilitation outcomes.
DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort.
SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation centers (N=7) from the Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation NeuroRecovery Network.
PARTICIPANTS: Patients with incomplete SCI (N=182) American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale level C (n=61) and D (n=121).
INTERVENTIONS: Intensive locomotor training, including step training using body weight support and manual facilitation on a treadmill followed by overground assessment and community integration.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Six-minute and 10-meter walk tests, Berg Balance Scale, Modified Functional Reach, and Neuromuscular Recovery Scale collected at enrollment, approximately every 20 sessions, and on discharge.
RESULTS: Walking and standing balance measures for all participants were strongly correlated (r≥.83 for all pairwise outcome correlations), standing and sitting balance measures were not highly correlated (r≤.48 for all pairwise outcome correlations), and walking measures were weakly related to sitting balance. The strength of relationships among outcome measures varied with functional status. Correlations among evaluation-to-evaluation changes were markedly reduced from performance correlations. Walk tests, when conducted with different assistive devices, were strongly correlated but had substantial variability in performance.
CONCLUSIONS: These results cumulatively suggest that changes in walking and balance measures reflect different aspects of recovery and are highly influenced by functional status and the utilization of assistive devices. These factors should be carefully considered when assessing clinical progress and designing clinical trials for rehabilitation.
DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort.
SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation centers (N=7) from the Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation NeuroRecovery Network.
PARTICIPANTS: Patients with incomplete SCI (N=182) American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale level C (n=61) and D (n=121).
INTERVENTIONS: Intensive locomotor training, including step training using body weight support and manual facilitation on a treadmill followed by overground assessment and community integration.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Six-minute and 10-meter walk tests, Berg Balance Scale, Modified Functional Reach, and Neuromuscular Recovery Scale collected at enrollment, approximately every 20 sessions, and on discharge.
RESULTS: Walking and standing balance measures for all participants were strongly correlated (r≥.83 for all pairwise outcome correlations), standing and sitting balance measures were not highly correlated (r≤.48 for all pairwise outcome correlations), and walking measures were weakly related to sitting balance. The strength of relationships among outcome measures varied with functional status. Correlations among evaluation-to-evaluation changes were markedly reduced from performance correlations. Walk tests, when conducted with different assistive devices, were strongly correlated but had substantial variability in performance.
CONCLUSIONS: These results cumulatively suggest that changes in walking and balance measures reflect different aspects of recovery and are highly influenced by functional status and the utilization of assistive devices. These factors should be carefully considered when assessing clinical progress and designing clinical trials for rehabilitation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app