We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Prospective comparison between buffered 1% lidocaine-epinephrine and skin cooling in reducing the pain of local anesthetic infiltration.
Dermatologic Surgery : Official Publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et Al.] 2012 October
BACKGROUND: Pain associated with the infiltration of local anesthesia is attributed to the acidity of the solution. Buffering with sodium bicarbonate has been used widely to reduce this affect. Growing evidence supports skin cooling (cryoanalgesia) as a measure to reduce infiltration pain.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of 1% lidocaine-epinephrine [1:100,000] buffered with sodium bicarbonate with skin cooling for 2 minutes with ice in reducing the pain of infiltration of anesthetic solution.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty healthy volunteers were recruited for this prospective study. Each subject received an intradermal injection of buffered solution in one arm and injection of unbuffered solution after ice application in the other arm. Immediately after each injection, subjects rated pain of infiltration on a 100-mm visual analog scale. Pain scores were compared using the paired t-test.
RESULTS: Sixty percent of subjects reported that pain of infiltration was greater after skin cooling than with buffered solution. Mean ± standard deviation pain scores were 24.8 ± 21.7 for skin cooling and 21.1 ± 20.8 for buffered solution; this difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference between buffered anesthetic solution (buffering) and skin cooling in reducing the pain of infiltration of 1% lidocaine - epinephrine.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of 1% lidocaine-epinephrine [1:100,000] buffered with sodium bicarbonate with skin cooling for 2 minutes with ice in reducing the pain of infiltration of anesthetic solution.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty healthy volunteers were recruited for this prospective study. Each subject received an intradermal injection of buffered solution in one arm and injection of unbuffered solution after ice application in the other arm. Immediately after each injection, subjects rated pain of infiltration on a 100-mm visual analog scale. Pain scores were compared using the paired t-test.
RESULTS: Sixty percent of subjects reported that pain of infiltration was greater after skin cooling than with buffered solution. Mean ± standard deviation pain scores were 24.8 ± 21.7 for skin cooling and 21.1 ± 20.8 for buffered solution; this difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference between buffered anesthetic solution (buffering) and skin cooling in reducing the pain of infiltration of 1% lidocaine - epinephrine.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2025 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app