An audit about labour induction, using prostaglandin, in women with a scarred uterus.

OBJECTIVES: Induction of labour after a previous caesarean section is still controversial. We aim to analyse, in a population of women who have a uterine scar, the maternal, foetal and neonatal complications in relation to the mode of labour and delivery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of collected data from all the singleton deliveries of patients with a scarred uterus (N=798), admitted to the hospital between August 2006 and March 2009.

OUTCOMES: maternal and perinatal complications.

RESULTS: Among 798 singleton deliveries, 36.1% had a spontaneous labour, 12.6% a prostaglandin-induced labour and 2.9% an ocytocin-induced labour, and 48.4% had an elective caesarean section. The chance of delivering vaginally was respectively 84.4% for those who had a spontaneous labour, 75.2% for those who were induced using prostaglandin, 82.6% after induction using ocytocin. There were eight uterine ruptures, four after spontaneous labour (1.4%), two after prostaglandin induction (2%) and two at the time of an iterative caesarean section (0.5%). There were no differences between groups, except the risk of haemorrhage (17.4% after spontaneously induced labour, 34.8% after ocytocin, 17.8% after prostaglandin and 44.6% after iterative caesarean section; p<0.005) and the neonatal admissions when analysed by intention to treat only (8.3% after spontaneously induced labour, 9.1% after ocytocin, 12% after prostaglandin and 16.8% after iterative caesarean section; p<0.009).

CONCLUSION: Although no increase in maternal or perinatal outcome was observed in relation to prostaglandin-induced labour after caesarean section, this study is too underpowered to exclude an increased risk.